Eric Adams criminal case that the judge rejected in New York

Judge on Wednesday to reject Federal criminal case against New York The mayor of the city Eric AdamsNearly two months after Trump The administration sought controversially to decrease corruption Accusations against Democrat.

The Del Provincial Court judge threw the case “with bias”, which is permanently banned Ministry of Justice From reviving the five indictment against Adams at the US District Court in Manhattan.

He has to requestHe refused to request the Ministry of Justice to take the case “without bias”, which would have allowed the re -renewal of fees against the mayor in the future.

He wrote: “It is important to make it clear that the court’s decision today is not related to whether the mayor Adams is innocent or guilty.”

The Ministry of Justice argued that the case should be rejected without bias, because the Adams trial would have interfered with his ability to rule the city and his ability to cooperate with the president Donald TrumpImmigration enforcement policies.

Seven federal representatives – including the American lawyer of Manhattan – resigned in protest against the request of the Ministry of Justice to submit the dismissal request.

In an amazing reprimand to the argument of the Ministry of Justice, he wrote in his matter, “Everything here collides with a deal: rejected the indictment in exchange for the concessions of the immigration policy” by Adams.

The judge wrote: “Take a step back from the details of this case, because the logical basis for enforcement of immigration in the Ministry of Justice is unprecedented and amazing in its sweep.”

“The Ministry of Justice does not cite any examples, and the court is unable to find any, from the government rejects charges against an elected official because this will enable the official to facilitate federal political goals.”

He also wrote that “the Ministry of Justice asserting that it” can be almost reviewed “to reject the fees on this basis is annoying in its expansion, which implicitly means that public officials may receive a special distributor if they are compatible with the priorities of the current administration policy.”

The judge wrote: “This proposal does not comply mainly with the basic promise of equality of justice under the law.”

He said that rejecting the case without bias “will create an inevitable perception that the mayor’s freedom depends on his ability to implement the priorities for enforcement of immigration in the administration.

He also said that he would create a perception that Adams, who is seeking to re -election this year, “may be more owned by the demands of the federal government more than the desires of his voters.”

He wrote: “This appearance is inevitable, and he consults in favor of the chapter with bias.”

“If the Ministry of Justice request,” if he is granted, the mayor will leave Adams under a ghost to form the table at any time, and for any reason, “he noticed.

The judge indicated that Adams requesting the dismissal with bias, and that the Ministry of Justice did not oppose this proposal, “effectively waived any objection to the permanent separation of this issue.”

He refused frankly the allegations by the Ministry of Justice that the trial of Adams was contaminated through the “violations of violations”, saying that he was “not supported by any objective evidence.”

“Instead, the record before the court indicates that the US Prosecutor’s Office for the Southern Region in New York who worked in this case followed all the appropriate guidelines of the Ministry of Justice,” he wrote.

“There is no evidence – zero – that they have any inappropriate motives.”

But the judge said that there are two reasons for rejecting the case: protecting the rights of the criminal defendant, and the lack of it is the authority to force the Ministry of Justice to prosecute Adams.

“This issue was not supposed to be brought and did not do anything wrong,” Adams told a news conference.

“I am now happy that our city can finally close the book about this for focus,” he said. “I would like to thank the New York residents who stood beside me, who prayed for me, who supported me from the first day, who stuck with me while we focused on work on hand.”

“This issue was an example of political weapons and wasting resources,” the Ministry of Justice said, in a statement to NBC News.

The Ministry of Justice said: “We are focusing on arresting the terrorists and trying it while they were returning the Ministry of Justice to its basic mission of preserving the safety of the Americans.”

Adams, a former police officer in New York City, was charged in September on charges of accusing him of a campaign contributing plan for a decade of time, bribery and other allegations.

The indictment was accused of Adams of accepting the illegal donations of his municipal campaign for the year 2021 and accepting free luxury travel since 2016, when he was president of Brooklyn Boro.

Prosecutors said that a senior official in the diplomatic establishment in Turkey facilitated the donations of the campaign for Adam

Later, Adams pressed the firefighting department in New York City to facilitate the opening of the new consulate building in Türkiye without searching a time in time to visit the President of Türkiye.

The case was filed by the Ministry of Justice when then President Joe Biden, democratic, was still in the White House.

After accusing him, Adams had preferred with Trump as he was seen as an attempt to reject the case, or to receive amnesty from the Republican.

American Prosecutor Daniel Sasson, who resigned in February instead of following up on a matter of rejecting the case, told Pam Bondi in a letter that he was in Adams’s lawyers at a meeting with her and the official Dig Dig Bova “urged what is a reformer to the equipped” supported by the Trump team’s head.

Adams Spiro’s lawyer denied Sasson’s claim.