Emerging countries and companies sue the American Nuclear Organization Committee

American nuclear In the 25 -year -old Isaiah Taylor’s blood: his grandfather worked on the Manhattan Project. In 2023, Taylor, who came out of high school to work in technology, began his nuclear company, Valar Atomics. It is currently developing a small test reactor, named after Taylor’s name. But the company says that the excessive arduous regulations imposed by the American Nuclear Regulatory Committee (NRC), the country’s main organizational body for nuclear reactors, forced Valar Atomics to develop the test reactor abroad.

In early April, Valar Atomics fell, in addition to the start of another nuclear operation, deep fission, as well as the states of Florida, Louisiana and the law of Arizona, on a suit Against NRC. The lawsuit, which was originally submitted by Texas, and the nuclear power in December, blames “NRC” for the creation of a new nuclear reactor restricted to the point that it rarely happens at all.

The United States was historically the global nuclear power force, but only Three reactors It has come online over the past 25 years, all behind the schedule and with laughter budgets. Meanwhile, other countries, such as China and South Korea, advanced with the construction of reactors of all sizes. Some nuclear defenders say that the United States regulation system, which imposes exhausting requirements and long time schedules on projects, greatly blaming this delay-especially when it comes to developing new designs for smaller reactors-and some reactors should be taken from NRC models. But others have concerns about possible attempts to overcome the country’s nuclear regulations for specific designs.

NRC has been long criticized for very slow permit times, ineffective operations, and controversial rear with nuclear companies. “The organizational relationship in the United States has been described as laws and hostile to the nuclear,” says Nick Turan, a licensed nuclear engineer who runs the website. What is nuclear. “This is a kind of unique Americans. In other countries, such as France and China, the organizers are more cooperative.”

The lawsuit takes these criticisms one step forward, claiming that by organizing smaller reactions, NRC makes a mistake in reading an essential part of nuclear legislation. In 1954, Congress approved Atomic Energy LawWhich created the modern nuclear organization in the United States. This law imposed regulations for nuclear facilities that used nuclear materials “in an amount to be important to defend and security” or that they use “in a way that affects the health and safety of the public.”

“We would like NRC to respect the law that was written,” says Taylor, who believes the reactor is working on sessions outside this mandate. “What will do for us is to allow the occurrence of occurrence again. Innovation is what drives the American economy.”

“NRC will take the necessity, in its necessity, in its trial files.”

Although we generally think about nuclear reactors as huge power plants, the reactors can be much smaller: models known as small standard reactors, or SMRS, usually produced a A third of energy From a larger reactor, while Even smaller reactors Known as Microtectors is designed Small enough to be transferred by Semitruck. Because of their size, these reactors are less dangerous in nature than their large counterparts. Simply not enough power in SMR for a three -miles is an island -style.