Doordash is The court’s claim to refuse The lawsuit filed by Uber in February, describing it as the award "Satisfactory intimidation tactics." Uber filed a lawsuit against the largest food delivery provider in the United States earlier this year, accusation From press restaurants to use their services exclusively. At that time, Uber said he heard from "Restaurants throughout the country" Doordash was receiving higher commission rates than restaurants that also sell their food on Uber to eat. Doordash was also accused of threatening to reduce restaurants in their lists if they are also available on the Uber Eats. But in his suggestion in dismissal, Doordash said that Uber’s lawsuit is not related to the protection of competition but avoids it.
Food delivery provider confirmed that Uber "He was unable to provide traders, consumers and high -quality services" Which provides it, so Uber "He resorted to confirming unnecessary legal claims" Instead of competing for its own advantages. She wrote in her suggestion that Uber’s complaint is "The misleading idea" It must change its commercial practices, which have argued that she is in support of the competition, to make room for Uber’s business. The company explained, however, that the law "She is interested in protecting competition, not competitors."
At the same time, Uber said Techcrunch Doordash was "They face difficulty in understanding" She complained. "When restaurants are forced to choose between unfair terms or revenge, this is not a competition – it is coercion," Her spokesman said. The San Francisco County Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a lawsuit in Uber on July 11.
This article originally appeared on Engadget on https://www.engadget.com/apps/doordash-calls-beers-lawsuit-accusing-net-Speetitive-practities-a-Scare-tactic-130040299.html?
[og_img]
Source link