Donald Trump’s discounts to the US government raises fears of the quality of economic data

Open the newsletter to watch the White House for free

Your guide to what the American elections mean 2024 for Washington and the world

Economists have warned that the deep discounts of the Trump administration on the federal workforce and research financing threaten the erosion of the quality and credibility of the “gold standard” statistics.

American data, from the job report to inflation indicators, can swing the Wall Street market of 105 True in the bond market in a second, and supports policies that affect the path of the largest economy in the world.

But economists are increasingly concerned about the efforts made by Elon Musk, the so -called Ministry of Governmental efficiency (Doge) to radically extinguish the government will undermine the ability of officials to collect, analyze and search for statistics on the American economy.

“All discounts in federal financing and some of the ones I have seen out of Duji are often a death blow to the already stretched surveying operations,” said Ricardo Reese, a professor of the Faculty of Economics in London, a Federal Federal Federal Reserve Adviser.

He added: “Things that fail to (consumer price index, gross domestic product) and others – all of these investigative studies that I think as possible green.”

The sprawling statistics process in the United States is decentralized, with more than ten agencies and units of data collection across many departments, including trade, employment and agriculture. These agencies produce major reports such as the consumer price index and the unscathed salaries, which are closely examined in Wall Street, as well as a set of prominent data that helps to inform politics and academic research discussions.

“Get the highest standards of absolute data quality, which the United States government “The statistical agencies have very decisive,” Austan Golsby, Chairman of the Federal Reserve at Chicago, told the Financial Times this week. It should be in the interest of everyone to ensure that the numbers are as accurate as possible. “

Trade Minister Howard Lootnick is that its circle produces a degree of gross domestic product that comes out of government spending, unlike international standards, worried whether political officials will seek to influence economic reports.

“The United States has always been the golden criterion for data, especially in things like GDP, workforce, and prices,” said Steve Sexheiti, an economist at the University of Brandis and former head of the Department of Economics and Criticism of the Bank. “It was the golden standard because society and the government supported and believed in measuring things as accurately as possible.”

Lootnick’s move to close the Federal Economic Statistical Consulting Committee, a body that advised statistics agencies, has sparked anxiety between economists who were included in Bath College of Business at the University of Chicago and FT earlier this month.

David Wilkox, who chaired the committee before its closure in February, said this step “is a shame, because the work of the council was almost no cost to the taxpayer and its closure will lead to a decrease in the quality of statistics.”

More than 90 percent of the respondents in the FT-CICAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGATH survey said they are either “a little” or “very” worried about the low quality of American economic data, partly due to the closure of FESAC.

Economists are also concerned that Dog’s attempts to spend will lead to a high degree of specialized knowledge that leaves the government – something they warn that it may end up with the cost of American taxpayer more than in the long run.

“The retirement of federal employees (pushing federal employees) may lead to a lot of very expert human capital who is walking outside the door,” said Matthew Shapiro, an economist at the University of Michigan, a former Fesac president.

Shapiro also believes that the executive order from President Donald Trump is expected to eliminate “information silos” that will force agencies to share data with officials appointed by the president to lead to a decrease in response rates of opinion polls, such as scanning the workforce.

Search networks that play an important role in developing and preserving standards, such as the National Office for Economic Research, are under pressure of billions of dollars in research financing.

Nber receives about half of its funding from the National Institutes of Health, the National Corporation for Science and the American Social Security Administration – all organizations that are now under Trump’s attempts to curb research spending.

Jim Bouberba, president of NBER, said that the current and proposed cuts in financing will lead his organization to expand the scope of activity and reduce costs. He said that while some money can be recovered from private sector financing sources, it was unlikely to be sufficient to match the loss in government financing.

“The researchers’ pipeline will become smaller, ”Boubraba said, adding that the potential impact will be the poorest policy decisions.