Do not send your Avatar from artificial intelligence to testify to you in court

In general, it is not a good idea to represent yourself in court. But there is another way, which is likely to be worse: you can say that you will represent yourself, then the task has been transferred to Amnesty International’s Avatar in order to show the startup capabilities. This seems to be the approach followed by Amnesty International businessman Jerome Diwald, according to Report from the recordAnd the court did not receive it well.

Here is the situation that Duwald found in: Diwald is the plaintiff in a dispute over employment with the MASSMUAL MEWTRO New York and was scheduled to present an argument before the court on March 26, 2025. Dewald was diagnosed with throat cancer 25 years ago, and according to his badness to the record, he is still suffering from the ongoing effects to talk about the challenge. So the court asked whether he could submit a video clip to make his statement – a reasonable request enough to seem that the court had approved it in advance.

Unless the court approves it, Based on the reaction of the judgeThe video presented by Diwald, which was not made by a statement, but instead, was an unprecedented public man. Just seconds from the business nail statement unveiled his name, Judge Sally Manzanite Daniels cut the video and asked, “Is this the lawyer of the case?” At that point, Doueld revealed that the person who made the statement was not a person at all-a video was created from artificial intelligence. “This is not a real person,” he told the court.

This was lost after that Judge Manzanite Daniels. She said: “It was good to know that when I submitted your request. You did not tell me, sir,” noting that Douald had witnessed a former long and held talks with the writer’s office for long periods without a problem. She said, “I cannot be misleading. Either you suffer from a disease that prevents you from being able to express or do not.”

It is possible now that the time is right to mention that Dewald heads an emerging AI company Pro se pro This helps people to represent themselves in legal issues with the tools of artificial intelligence – a fact that the judge seemed to know, as I told him, “This courtroom will not use as a launch of your work, sir.”

In order to be fair in Duwald, his image that was created with his own platform, which he told Record He was on a dead end for about a year due to lack of financing. A representative of artificial intelligence, called “Jim”, was created with a free experience of artificial intelligence service called Tavos. While he was planning to present a copy of the artificial intelligence himself to speak before the court, he could not obtain the trial to work on this, he is He said to RegistHe just settled on “one of their symmetrical copies, that great few of a man.”

However, the appearance of self -promotion as well as the unexpected appearance of Ai AIVATAR was sufficient to obtain Diwald from the court. He continued to present his argument alone, and since then a glow to the fact that he may have had a head that he would use artificial intelligence to present his case. The lesson.