Discordant: How Trump’s attacks are divided into the Houthis by the Republican base Donald Trump News

Photo of author

By [email protected]


Divisions on the right between those who believe in a global system supported by American military power and others who see that this system as disposal of American resources is not new. That the defection lasted for decades.

The last group, which often included super and racist figures, was pushed to the parties after the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001.

The United States responded to these attacks by launching the global “war on terror”, as conservatives support the power of American interference in countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan.

But these wars have become bloody and long failures, as the public began to become more doubtful that the United States will participate abroad.

Mills said: “The youth in particular who witnessed these catastrophic wars are not sold on the benefits of this global or ideological security architecture that lead to interference abroad,” Mills said.

Since he took office for the first time in 2017, Trump mostly continued the routine use of the US military force abroad, as he supervised drones in the Middle East and Africa and the assassination of Iranian general Soleimani during his first term in his post.

During his second term, he publicly thought about using military force to control the Panama and Greenland channel.

Close to Donald Trump
President Donald Trump has suggested that he could take over the Panama and Greenland channel (Carlos Baria/Reuters)

But the experts said that he also realized the political benefits of placing himself as a waring candidate and a critic of the Foreign Policy Foundation, which has become credible in the eyes of many voters.

In his 2024 presidential campaign, for example, Trump promised to put a rapid end of wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, where the Israeli war in Gaza killed more than 49,617 Palestinians – a figure that experts said is likely to be hidden, given thousands of bodies buried under your kiss.

Trump’s position on many Ukraine has made many on the right, who see his actions evidence of a transaction approach that puts interests for us first.

For example, the president pressed Ukraine to give the United States to reach its mineral resources as compensation for the cost of US military assistance. This week, it is even the party to control the energy infrastructure in Ukraine in our hands.

But Trump was more hesitant to exert similar pressure on Israel, even when the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ignored the ceasefire Trump’s boast of investigation.

“In general, I think we have seen that the Trump administration is making certain decisions that reflect the readiness of the Pak Convention in ways that some people find worried, such as approaching Russian preferences to end the war in Ukraine,” said Anil Shell, a researcher at the Queens Institute for the Second, a fight against inflammation.

“But I believe that Israel has its own weight, and that the policies related to Israel will not be affected by some of these same impulses. It seems that it has become a blind spot for this administration, as it was for Biden.”

Donald Trump raises a fist while standing next to Benjamin Netanyahu
President Donald Trump, left, welcomes Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the White House on February 4 (Lea Milice/Reuters)

This contradiction indicates more tensions within the Trump alliance.

While the contradiction and even the explicit hostility towards Ukraine has become common, foreign policy writer Matthew Betty, an assistant editor in the Hariri Magazine, said that the conservative movement is withdrawn in different directions when it comes to Israel, and he is an American ally for a long time.

He told the island of Al -Jazeera through the text: “The new aversion to foreign wars, especially in the Middle East, sat uncomfortable with the right -wing cultural rapprochement of Israel.”

“The question has become impossible recently, as Israel has become the main justification for intertwining in the region.”

He explained that although a major discussion on Israel and American foreign policy, the extreme right is settled specifically with internal divisions.

Some, for example, see Israel as a valuable template of muscle nationalism. On the contrary, figures such as Nick Fuentes, who embraces anti -Semitism, opposes Trump’s embrace of Israel.

How will these contradictions work themselves in the Trump movement still must be seen.

While Israel’s popular support has weakened in recent years, especially among young voters, the Republican Party is still highly supportive of strong American assistance to the country in the Middle East.

Trump appears to be slightly affected by the internal divisions due to his strikes against the Houthis.

On Wednesday, a social networking site wrote: “I have caused massive damage to the Houthi barbarians,” he wrote on a social networking site on Wednesday. “They will be completely exterminated!”



https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2025-03-21T161036Z_1502344402_RC2SHDA0WW2K_RTRMADP_3_USA-TRUMP-1742574594.jpg?resize=1920%2C1440

Source link

Leave a Comment