Dirty: Trump reduces shock on chatting a leakage sign about the Houthi attack Donald Trump News

The administration of the President of the United States Donald Trump continued to face repercussions from an article in the Atlantic Ocean that revealed the editor -in -chief Jeffrey Goldberg to a group chat where senior level government officials Discuss the plans To bomb Yemen.

The White House remained in a damage monitoring on Tuesday, seeking to reject allegations that the government’s secrets were in danger.

“There was no secret information, as I understood it,” Trump said at a meeting of the US ambassadors.

“We have looked very much. It’s very simple, to be honest. It’s just something that can happen.”

He told reporters that he had no intention to search for sanctions, except for the use of the social media application signal or an apology from those concerned.

Trump’s comments come in response to the Goldberg article, which was published one day before, where the editor explains how he received an invitation on the signal of the correspondence platform from a user identified as the White House National Security Adviser Michael Walz.

Before Goldberg, the invitation. He soon found himself in the midst of a conversation about the advantages of bombing the Houthi fighters in Yemen.

While Goldberg refused to quote specific military information from the chat, he participated in the interactions of his article published between officials at the highest level of the government, including Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

For example, Vens, Higseth and Internal Security Adviser, Stephen Miller, were quoted as a discussion of the timing of attacks and whether the economic gain from Europe can be “extracted” in exchange for the bombings.

In particular, the Vice President expressed concern that the bombings will make more effort to benefit from European trade in the Red Sea, where it is known that the Houthis are hitting naval ships and shipping.

Essay I created a splash In Washington, DC, as soon as it is published. Questions were raised about the reason for discussing sensitive information on a non -governmental platform and whether text messages will be preserved, as required by federal record laws.

Some of these questions were asked directly to two participants in the sign chat, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency John Ratcliffe and the Director of National Intelligence Tolsi Gabbard.

In the hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday, Ratcliffe and Gabbard witnessed a barbecue from Democrats.

“This was not only dirty. Not only did all measures violate, but if this information comes out, American life cannot be lost. If the Houthis have this information, they can reinstall their defense systems,” said Senator Mark Warner, the committee’s highest democracy.

“It is also just a confusing reason for me that all of these great people were on this line, and no one disturbed until the validity of security 101.”

Senator Ron Widen, another democratic, described the sign chat “clearly that the reckless, clearly dangerous.”

Widan said: “Bad information classified and the deliberate destruction of federal records are possible crimes that must be investigated immediately,” said Widan. “I want to make it clear that I see that there should be resignation, starting with the National Security Adviser and the Minister of Defense.”

Classified information issues

However, the White House position is that no secret information has been issued on the sign chat.

In his article, Goldberg is clear that the supreme secrecy Information has been included In group chat messages.

Goldberg wrote: “The information contained in it, if it has been read by a opponent of the United States, can be used to harm the American army and intelligence,” Goldberg wrote.

If Goldberg repeated that information in its publication, he would have opened himself to legal repercussions. Instead, Goldberg presented a wide description of what happened in the chat.

“What I will say, in order to clarify the shocking recklessness of this signal conversation, is that Higseth Post contains operational details about the coming strikes on Yemen, including information about the goals, the weapons that the United States will spread, and the attack sequence.”

But on Tuesday, the Trump administration objected to this evaluation, saying that no secrets were revealed in the sign chat.

“Jeffrey Goldberg is known for its exciting role,” the White House press secretary Caroline Levit books On social media. “Here are the facts about his last story: 1.” War plans were discussed. “

Ratcliffe and Gabard repeated similar notes at the session in Capitol Hill, which refused to share the higher secret information about the signal, whether in that chat or another.

“In order to be clear, I did not participate in any groom messages related to any secret information at all,” said Ratcliffe.

“I have the same answer,” Gabbard repeated. Unlike Ratcliffe, Gabbard refused to admit whether she was participating in the chat, as stated in the Goldberg article.

Their stance led to a hot confrontation with Senator Warner, who argued that – if the chat did not contain classified information – its contents should be issued immediately for review.

“Why will you not enter the details? Is this everything classified?” Warner asked.

“Because this is currently being reviewed by national security -” Gabbard began to respond, as Warner intervened: “Because it is all classified? If it is not classified, share the text now.”

At meeting with US ambassadors, Trump denied that there was any violation of national security.

“Our national security is now stronger than before,” Trump told reporters. Instead, blame technology – specifically the signal application – to allow Goldberg to reach a private chat.

He said: “It is not the perfect technique. There is no perfect technique. The technology is really very stressful, and it is difficult to reach.”

Trump restores competition with the Atlantic Ocean

The scandal also allowed the sensitive information in the chatting chat to Trump to renew his reign against Atlantic, where Goldberg works.

Trump criticized the magazine in the past, especially after the publication of the 2020 report, which claimed that the Republican leader had led to the extraction of the soldiers in particular as “losers” and “Masoon”. Trump himself is not an old military warrior, but he publicly interrogated the service of soldiers like the late Senator John McCain.

Goldberg also composed this article. Trump denied the allegations at the time, describing the article as a “stigma”.

The Republican leader has long been inhabited against the main media, and even indicates that their reports may be illegal.

When he addressed the scandal at a meeting on Tuesday, Trump Goldberg again devoted to his reports.

Trump said, “I knew that the man was a complete armpit bag,” Trump said. “The Atlantic Ocean is a failed magazine. It does so very badly. No one gives it.

Trump then turned into Waltz, who was also sitting at the meeting, and began defending the clear mistake of the advisor in Goldberg’s invitation to the sign chat.

“He is a very good man. This man is a very good man, there, criticizes him,” Trump said, hinting at the Valus. “He is a very good man, and he will continue to do a good job.”

Vazz, a former representative in the United States in Florida, calms himself to direct the finger to the Atlantic Ocean.

“I think there are a lot of lessons. There are many journalists in this city who have achieved great names for themselves to make up for lies about this president,” Waltz said.

“This is in particular, I never met him. I don’t know. He never communicated with her. We look at him and review how he reached this room.”

However, the Democrats praised Goldberg for controlling the failure to spread national security secrets and to remove itself voluntarily from the sign chat.

Senator Warner said in the intelligence session: “Regardless of the extent of the Minister of Defense or others desire to extract it, this journalist was at least the ethics of non -reporting, I think, everything he heard,” Senator Warner said in the intelligence session.

Trump doubles on “free loading” in Europe

What Goldberg did it literally quoted the messages in which senior officials discussed whether the attacks on Yemen would be delayed – and whether Europe would benefit more than the bombings.

For example, the publication of an account that appears to be affiliated with Vice President Vice Vice -Vice, which highlights the amount of European trade that passes through the Red Sea and the surrounding waterways.

“3 percent of American trade pass through Suez. 40 percent of European trade,” Vans wrote.

“I am not sure that the president realizes how consistently this is with his message to Europe now.”

Vans seemed to have returned to postponing the bombings for a month, but he ultimately withdrew his objections – although not other criticism in Europe.

“If you think we should do it, let’s go. I just hate to save Europe again,” it seems that Vans wrote.

Therefore, Defense Minister Higseth, Vice President, replied, I am completely involved in the European free loading. It is compassionate. “

It seems that bargaining the rear room confirms what has long been predicted in the public domain: that the relations between the United States and Europe are in a declining segment.

Trump accused Europe of taking advantage of the United States, pointing to the trade deficit that appears to the Americans consume more European goods than vice versa. On April 2, his administration plans to implement what Trump called “Mutual definitionsThe import tax identification is imposed by other countries.

At a meeting on Tuesday, Trump was asked whether he agreed with the evaluation of Higseth and Fans that Europe is “free download”.

“Do you really want to answer it?” Trump asked, Deadpan. “Yes. I think they were independent. The European Union was very terrible for us in trade. Terrible.”

Then the trend turned, and his peace reached Negotiations with Russia And Ukraine, as well as the upcoming definitions. “I think I was very fair to the countries that have been economically abused for decades.”