Democrats admit that the left has chosen a wrong battle for the deportation of Kilmar Abro Garcia

Representative Henry Coellar is back down from his party because of his position on immigration, and his Democratic fellow criticized for defending an illegitimate immigrant that the Trump administration says is a violent member of the MS-13 gang.

“This is not the right issue to talk about legal procedures. This is not the right situation. This is not the right person to say that we need to return it to the United States,” said Cuellar, D-Texas, “Brian Celid ShowOn Radio Fox News.

Cuellar was referring to Kilmar Abrago GarciaA 29 -year -old illegitimate immigrant was deported in March to a prison in El Salvador. The Trump administration claims that the Parisia Paris is affiliated with the MS-13 violent gang Court documents published for a preventive order from his wife. Some Democrats argue that he is deprived of due procedures and demands his return.

Jennifer Vasquiz Surra, the wife of Appiro Garcia, said in a The last statement She was behaving out of caution by searching for a preventive matter.

She partially said: “After I escaped domestic violence in a previous relationship, I acted with caution after a dispute with Kilmar by searching for a civil preventive matter, in the event that things escalate.” “Matters did not escalate, and decided not to follow up with the civil court. We were able to work through the situation separately as a family, including going to consultation.”

Cuellar said that Apiru Garcia invited migration harmful to the party’s credibility with the voters.

The Democrats smoked the “legal procedures” of Parisia, despite the long history of the party, deceiving the legal principle

“Democrats should not take this issue,” said Coellar. “When you look at immigration, is this the issue of immigration that you want to take to fight? In my opinion, no at all.”

Democratic lawmakers challenge administration deportation policies, including flights that send suspects with illegal criminal immigrants to Central America. Many legislators have Travel to El Salvador To defend the release of Aberigo Garcia and asked to prove his daily life.

The Democrats ask “evidence of life” for La Leigo Garcia after his meeting was rejected in El Salvador

Abrojo Garcia illegally crossed the American border, but later tried to obtain a protected legal status while living in Maryland.

His deportation for 2025 was described in the court as Administrative error. However, some Trump officials say the removal is justified, citing the alleged gangs’ relations.

Cuellar, which includes the South Texas region of the Great Latin population, said it has heard an increasing frustration of voters about what they see as an inconsistent and unfair migration system.

“People used to say,” our parents came in the legal way. They came, and they became legal residents, “and” they entered and did it in the right way. “But when you see people jump, they do not know who they are.” “This is wrong.”

Cuellar also expressed its support for some Border policies dating back to the Trump eraEspecially with regard to security and enforcement. He rejected the previous democratic allegations that the borders were safe.

“It was laughing when they say the border had been secured,” he said. “Why will we allow people when you do not have any idea about who these people are, then let them wander around the streets of the United States while waiting for four or five years in a hearing of the Immigration Court? This was a mistake, completely wrong.”

While Cuellar said he did not do that The judge, his democratic colleagues As for their options, he asked about the strategy of the broader party in immigration and indicated that some Trump administration policies had an impact.

Click here to get the Fox News app

“The President got Mexico to engage much more, if he could make them play defense on their line under 20 yards instead of our line called the American border, the better,” he said.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration continues to face legal challenges on the immigration agenda. the The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a case In May, federal judges who prevented an executive order aimed at ending the ongoing citizenship of illegal immigrants.