Remember when Pixar changed the animation forever with “a bold, innovative and creative game story?” What about when the studio continued to issue The original films that pushed the animated way forward While exploration of different stories and types (such as “A Bug’s Life” and “Monsters, Inc.” and “The Incredibles”)? Certainly, there were sequences even in the previous days, but did not make films like “Toy Story 2” something new and different from its predecessors, but it was also balanced by the weakness of the original Pixar movies.
Well, say goodbye to the old days! Pixar, like her mother company, Walt Disney Studios, revolves around chasing the great dollar and dribbling with artistic follow -up technically that parents will go to cinemas to see because there is nothing else to entertain children in films. We already knew that Pixar was Not just a complement to another “game story”But also the third movie “The Incredibes”. Now, the CEO of Disney, who refuses to leave, Bob Egger, announced that “Coco 2” has an active development in Pixar and aims at the 2029 theatrical release.
“Although the film is only in the initial stages, we know it will be full of humor, heart and adventure.” threatening I promised in a press release. “We cannot wait for the participation more soon.”
“COCO 2”, to be completely frank, a terrible idea, more than “Story of Game 5” or “Incredibles 3.” Certainly, it makes a lot of meaning commercial. Like “Inside Out”, the original movie “Coco” was the only real Pixar movie that the Pixar movie for the year 2010 (a turbulent contract gave the studio the first box office bomb with “The Good Dinosaur”). However, while “Coco 2” can be A huge blow along the “Inside Out 2” lines, “ The risks that strongly reduce the cultural influence and the importance of its predecessor.
Coco 2 is logical, but it is still a terrible idea
“Coco” was a great movie, even a masterpiece. She not only had amazing animation and production design, but also a great story that perfectly portrayed Mexican culture and traditions. But “Coco” is definitely not a movie that gives way to completion. After all, the title of the movie is in itself a sign of a character who died at the end of the movie. Will the sequel simply bring Mama Koku (expressed by the late Anna Ofelia Morjoya in the first movie) by reconsidering it in the land of the dead? Will her grandson Miguel (Anthony Gonzales) have to solve another mystery that involves a secret relative?
The thing is that the story in “COCO” was not just Miguel in a big adventure. It was a film on growth, although that did not lend himself easily to continue (even with Miguel raising again in focus). Instead, “Coco” told an independent individual story, complete with a puzzle that has been solved and has never left any continuous questions and does not follow up on follow -up. A story of wisdom, “COCO” continues to read about creative bankruptcy such as many Disney’s direct consequences to the twentieth century of the nineties (such as “The Hunchback of Notre Dame II”).
There is also a problem that Disney and Pixar has been since the original “COCO” version. Although the press statement of Disney says that the continuation will return the director Lee Uncard and co -manager/co -writer Adrian Molina, he does not say anything about the “COCO” song writing team in Molina, Jereman Franco, Robert Lopez and Christine Anderson Lopez. Will any of them return alongside Molina? Will Disney tried to change the song style to be more “commercial” in continuation? Do he dare bring Manuel Miranda just because it is possible?
Frankly, it is difficult to imagine that “Coco 2” anywhere near the giant success “COCO” was creative. But hey, as long as she earns some money, at least Disney will be happy …
Source link
https://www.slashfilm.com/img/gallery/coco-2-officially-confirmed-by-pixar-heres-why-thats-a-bad-idea/l-intro-1742495176.jpg