Clint Eastwood’s Thriller is at number one on the streaming charts days after its release

“Juror No. 2” was supposed to be a box office hit when it premiered in theaters in November. But for whatever reason, Warner Bros. It was released in only 50 theaters, burying what was billed as Clint Eastwood’s final film. Take out the 94 year old The most exciting courtroom drama of 2024 with “Juror No. 2”, It received excellent reviews and a 93% rating on Rotten tomatoes. However, Warner Bros. decided to This screen legend’s latest directorial effort has not been released, and it appears she only released it theatrically so the film could qualify for awards.

There’s more evidence that the studio should have given the film a wide release, as “Juror No. 2” finally dropped on the Max streaming service and became an instant hit. Is this an argument in favor of delaying the film to ensure it makes a bigger impact on streaming? Maybe, but as most people know by now, these streaming platforms don’t make much money for the industry anyway, so a bigger box office gain would certainly interest Warner CEO David Zaslav. Unfortunately, we are simply not privy to the machinations of the World Bank’s Board of Directors, so the silent release of “Juror No. 2” will remain a mystery for now.

If you’re Oscar-winning director and Hollywood legend Clint Eastwood, then having your latest film unofficially released online is definitely not the swan song you envisioned. Unfortunately, it will probably be uncomfortable to see the film do so well on Max. But the performance is good, with MAX fans rallying behind Eastwood’s latest effort as soon as it hits MAX servers.

In “Juror No. 2” Nicholas Hoult, who will soon play Lex Luthor in James Gunn’s “Superman,” He plays husband and father Justin Kemp, who is called for jury service only to immediately realize that the man on trial is not guilty of murder. How does he know? Because once the trial begins, Justin realizes that he is almost certainly responsible for the victim’s death, triggering a serious personal crisis that leads to a poignant story supported by great performances from Toni Collette (“Knives Out”) and JK Simmons (“Injury”).

If that sounds really good, Max fans seem to think so too. “Juror No. 2” struck Max on December 20, after a disappointing stage appearance the previous month. Almost immediately, the film became a huge hit, with viewers around the world streaming the film and sending it to the top of the most-watched charts on the Warner Bros. streaming platform. Discovery.

according to Flex Patrola site that compiles streaming viewing data, “Juror No. 2” is showing in 48 countries around the world as of December 23, 2024. Even more impressive, the film is at No. 1 in 19 of those countries, including the U.S. United. , where it reached the chart at number one on December 22 and looks like it will stay there for the foreseeable future. Interestingly, it took American viewers a little longer than the rest of the world to get Clint Eastwood’s latest film to the top spot, as “Juror No. 2” debuted at No. 1 in 23 countries the day after it arrived on Max, while “Juror No. 2” debuted at No. 1 in 23 countries the day after it arrived on Max. “Juror No. 2” ranked first in 23 countries. The United States caught fire the next day. The film has since remained at the top of the charts in 16 countries, which while not the kind of farewell Eastwood was hoping for, is at least something.

As the holiday season continues, you might expect “Juror No. 2” to falter as audiences stream holiday classics in earnest. But if you take a look at Max’s charts, which recently saw Kiernan Shipka’s Thanksgiving-themed romantic comedy take over, You’ll see the Clint Eastwood drama seeing competition not from Christmas classics but from critics “Joker: Folie à Deux,” which became a huge hit on the platform After his shameful theatrical appearance. “The Clown Prince of Crime” is currently in second place, while Tim Burton’s “Beetlejuice Beetlejuice” is in third place. These films have been on Warner’s streaming service a little longer than “Juror No. 2,” so Eastwood’s drama has every chance of staying at No. 1 throughout the remainder of the Christmas season.

Meanwhile, if Eastwood was planning to make another film, he would be well within his rights to throw a Christopher Nolan-style tantrum and leave Warner in the dust for his next film. For whatever reason, some Warners exec (possibly David Zaslav) apparently thought this mid-budget legal drama would do horribly in theaters, and while I think you could make an argument for “Juror No. 2” being better suited to streaming in In an age where mid-budget dramas don’t make big money at the box office, this is Clint Eastwood we’re talking about. Leaving aside all the evidence that “Juror No. 2” would have done well with a wide release, you’ve got to give the guy his roses for good. At least he can take comfort in knowing that the streaming crowds rallied behind his movie, and if nothing else, hopefully this whole debacle will prompt him to make another movie before he gives up for good.