China prohibits “independent driving” claims from car marketing after disruption

China has banned the country’s auto companies from marketing its cars in great terms such as “smart driving” or “independent driving” after a Murderer Including Xiaomi SU7. The car was in the driver’s help with the car approaching the construction area, but the driver took control of only before the car reached a concrete barrier. Three passengers were killed in the accident.

The problem of any auxiliary system below 4 – in which the car can work completely without human intervention – is that drivers are still required to pay attention to the road and intervene as needed, but is satisfied. By the time the driver realizes that the accident may happen, it may be late. This is the main reason behind the criticism of Tesla and CEO Elon Musk for offering autonomous leadership capabilities with terms such as “Autopilot” and “full self -driving”. To protect itself from responsibility, Tesla is now surrounding its language, referring to its most advanced system as “full self -driving (under supervision)”, and the company monitors drivers to ensure their hands are on the wheel.

The new rules set by the Chinese authorities also state that car manufacturers cannot use car owners as Guinea pigs to test new updates for their drivers assistance programs. Any new algorithm updates should be subject to a battery of the tests before they are delivered to the vehicles over the air. Starting in 2026, new battery safety standards will also be implemented in an attempt to reduce fires.

Despite all its problems, one thing about a single -party dictatorship like China is that it can lead to politics quickly. In the United States, a similar step will be busy banning marketing language in lawsuits and organizational challenges for years.

An example of this: Once again in 2022, California accused DMV Tesla from Filled filming its vehicles as independent Based on the marketing language. The company’s vehicles were at a high -level accident center, which included a level of the driver’s assistance, and critics say that MUSK autonomy has prompted some drivers to overestimate their capabilities. But Tesla argued that he was Within the rights of freedom of expression To use the language, no action has been taken.

The Chinese dictatorship is the same reason behind the country’s ability to dismantle the United States in electric cars as a whole-the Communist Party decided to be important, and no one in the country has opposed. Democracy moves much slower, although this is a good thing and design; Sometimes, small authoritarian muscles have their benefits.

Tesla has long claimed that the independent software makers are safer, but the company has faced a large group of organizational investigations in the United States over the years, with the National Council for Highway Transport Safety in recent times The start of the investigation In the “Smart Summon” feature in Tesla, which allows vehicles to move short distances, such as car parking, without the driver inside. The agency was a thorn on the side of musk Some time:

A a report In 2022, NHTSA claimed that during the previous twelve months, Teslas accounted for about 70 percent of car accidents that included drivers assistance systems. Tesla function is often criticized with the help of the driver, autopilot, with regulator reduction that it may play a role in accidents. In fact, NHTSA published Another report Last April, which claimed that the Autopilot function in Tesla had a “critical safety gap” that can be linked to hundreds of accidents. and analysis Last summer, the Washington Post found that Tisla, the automated pilot, participated in a total of 17 deaths and up to 736 accidents since 2019. The newspaper has again cited NHTSA statistics.

NHTSA reports that Teslas is involved in a large number of deadly incidents thanks to the rules of the Biden era that ask the auto companies to inform the agency whenever you share a car that uses an independent program in a crash. Again in December I mentioned The Trump Transition team was considering killing the base.

Acolytes of Tesla claims that full self -driving technology is approaching a point as it will be able to operate vehicles on their own. The company says it plans to launch an independent cabin service in Austin by the end of the year. Musk missed his declared expectations on the full independence that dates back to 2016, when he said that Tesla’s vehicles would be able to lead themselves within a year. In 2019, more than a million robots would be on the road by 2020.

It turned out that the last 10 % of the autonomy in a solution was the most difficult part, but other companies, including Waymo, have started to reach there, and offer full independent services throughout the United States at a rapid pace. In China, car manufacturers such as BYD have developed their self -driving features, indicating that Tesla does not once driving.