The Canadian General in charge of external and home operations says that the detailed planning of the “potential coalition of peace mission” to Ukraine is expected to start this week between Western military leaders.
The idea of peacekeeping is internationally met with suspicion that Ukraine and Russia are indirectly gathered to calm the limited ceasefire.
Loknant Jin. Steve Puvin suggested that Canada be extended to contribute, but it is possible to replace the forces that train the Ukrainian forces to preserve peace.
He told CBC News that a preliminary gathering of senior military leaders from 28 countries expressed his willingness to contribute to the force – which was published in the event of a ceasefire – last week in the United Kingdom.
Boivin participated in discussions.
The indirect negotiations of the ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine began on Monday in Saudi Arabia, an effort by the United States. In principle, the two countries have agreed to stop one month of strikes on energy infrastructure after US President Donald Trump spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Folodimir Zelinski last week, but there is uncertainty about how to take place.
British Prime Minister Kiir Starmer proposed several weeks ago the peacekeeping force consisting of many NATO countries, including Canada.
In early March, before inviting the federal elections on Sunday, Defense Minister Bill Blair Canada said it was “ready and capable” to contribute to the forces There should be a ceasefire.
“I will confirm that we do not know what the ceasefire conditions can be. So we are working to operate a number of assumptions and develop emergency plans,” said Bouvin. “The general goal is to provide options for decision makers.”
Trump’s special envoy, Steve Whitkov, rejected, at the end of last week, the peacekeeping plan in Starmer as a “wrap position”.
US President Donald Trump said he intends to end the war in Ukraine, but exactly how it could be revealed for discussion. Andrew Zhang breaks the decision that all Russia, Ukraine and the United States want, and how the conflicting interests make their goals not compatible. Pictures provided by Getty Images, Reuters and Canadian Press.
Meanwhile, several UK media outlets reported on Monday that senior British military commanders – quoted their identity – say that the Prime Minister has come before himself. They said that detailed planning will not be completed by April 20 – the final date of the ceasefire.
It is clear that it will be a struggle for contributing to Canada.
Canada is in the midst of the elections, and if the new government agrees to deploy peacekeepers, it faces the fact that there are not many Canadian forces to wander.
The army was struggling to re-fill the ranks after the Covid-19 and Crisis of sexual misconduct Which affected a large number of leaders.
There are up to 400 Canadian soldiers involved in the training of Ukrainian forces, and Paevin said that one of the options is under consideration of his headquarters is “re -generating” some, or all of them, on the mission of peacekeeping.
“The guidelines that my team gave are: Let’s start with what we have already on the ground,” said Puvin, referring to the forces deployed abroad.
The training of Ukrainian soldiers – the main recruits, paramedics, and tank teams, were among others – a panel pause for the liberal government because it emphasized its support for the besieged country. More than 32,000 Ukrainian soldiers were trained under the operation of UNIFIER and often continued as a major demand by the Zelinsky government.
Peven said that one of the reasons that you may need to be replaced is that one of the reasons Building and leadership of the NATO Brigade in Latvia.
“We will not affect our contribution to Latvia,” said Bouvin. “We committed to NATO.”
He said that the two allied military planners began to look at the size and formation of the potential peacekeeping force, and the extent of its armament.
This is the legitimate concern given the allied intelligence estimates that it was found that there are about 700,000 Russian soldiers in and around Ukraine, and the Ukrainian army has more than a million soldiers under weapons.
It can be the size of the required force is huge
In a recent analysis of the Washington-based Strategic and International Studies Center, Benjamin Jensen wrote that, given the front line of about 2100 km-it is possible that the volume of peacekeeping force is huge.
Jensen, a great colleague at the Research Center, wrote on February 25 /
“In other words, keeping peace in Ukraine has the ability to eclipse in the previous NATO tasks in the Balkans in both its size and complexity.”
It can range – estimated – from anywhere a few thousand soldiers along the road to 100,000, a force that must be armed and supported by copies.
To ensure security, this force should not only work as a deterrent, but must have the ability to combat the war to confront the Russian potential And woe Jensen wrote attacks along the border.
“This force will require additional assets of air, marine and satellite to cover the air and sea corridors that Russia can use to launch a preventive attack in the future.”
Anthony King, a professor from the Institute of Strategy and Security at the University of Exeter, suggested that the primary assumption is that any power of peacekeeping in Ukraine will need us.
“It seems likely that European countries, a coalition, are able to collect a reliable force, and may generate enough goodwill in the White House to the president to provide some additional support,” King said in a statement on the talks in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
“The support of the US infrastructure at least will be necessary, and therefore the peacekeeping force can benefit from impressive air defense systems in the United States of America. This will be necessary to secure Ukraine’s security in the future.”
https://i.cbc.ca/1.7461059.1742856876!/cpImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_1180/russia-ukraine-war.jpg?im=Resize%3D620
Source link