“Black Monday 2.0”? Jim Kramer predicts the collapse of the market in 1987, “if the president does not try to communicate …”

In a blatant warning to investors, American commentator Jim Kramer expected that the recent tariff measures presented by President Donald Trump could be crowned with the suspicion of the market reminding us of the famous “Black Monday” in 1987. Kramer urged the American president to “communicate” with the countries that refrained from imposing reprisals, while emphasizing the need for the reward of these countries to prevent the escalating crisis.

Kramer said: “If the president does not try to communicate with these countries and companies that play according to the rules, then the scenario in 1987 … which we decreased for three days and then 22 % decreased on Monday, he has the most beneficial.” The prediction highlights the possibility of major disturbances in the market if current commercial tensions are not treated immediately.

The announcement of a 10 % “baseline” tariff has sent on global imports already shocking waves through US financial markets. The main indicators have witnessed radical declines, as the S&P 500 index decreased by 6 % – its worst performance since the outbreak of the epidemic in 2020. Dow Jones exposed a loss of 1,679 points on Thursday, followed by another decrease of 2,231 points on Friday. This recession was not present in the United States; Markets throughout Europe and Asia also felt influence.

Cramer warned that the situation could deteriorate more if it is not taken, which may lead to its crash by Monday. “We will not have to wait a long time to know it. We will know this by Monday.” This comment indicates that diplomatic participation is urgent to alleviate the repercussions of customs tariff policies.

Despite the fateful expectations, CRAMER noticed that strong job data in the United States may serve as a complete stagnation. He stated: “It makes it likely to collapse necessarily lead to recession,” which indicates that the strong labor market can provide some flexibility amid financial disturbance.

Kramer, known for his bold expectations, was a mixed record. His previous forecasts were met during the critical economic periods, such as the 2007-2008 financial crisis, due to inaccuracy. This date adds a layer of caution to its current warning, as observers have taken its predictions with a degree of doubt.

“I will contain my anger, but only because I lived during the year 87, and at the end, I went out well. I was a criticism for the incident. I know what this looks,” unlike Kramer, relying on the personal experience to emphasize the severity of the situation. Its comments confirm the possibility of important market movements that remind us of the previous financial crises.

While the direct future is still uncertain, the effects of definitions continue to integrate through global markets.