“Awesome Service, Zero Trust …”: The viral post says that the Indian name hurts commercial emails, and ignites the debate on global bias

Reddit user ignited a hot discussion after sharing that he gets better responses when using a non -Indian name in commercial emails. In his post, entitled “Why no one wants to deal with the Indians?” The user revealed that it works in B2B sales and created “the ego change” in the name of a non -Indian. “Whenever I send emails using my non -Indian name, I get better results for that when I use my Indian name,” he wrote, highlighting a worrying pattern.

A deeper issue or external bias

The user also indicated that in various commercial societies, it has been a common discussion that companies prefer not to deal with Indian companies. “Whether it is a service or product, no one wants to sell or buy from the Indians,” he pointed out, as he wondering whether this is due to external discrimination or defects within the culture of Indian business itself.

“I know I am general here, but this makes me crazy. I see this distinction,” he wrote. “But then I wonder, maybe we are wrong here?”

His fears struck a tendon, which led to a flood of responses from others who suffered similar biases – some of which are attributed to negative perceptions of Indian commercial practices.

Frustration from the culture of Indian business

One of the users, who claimed to be working closely with both Indian and Middle East companies, pointed out that customer experience is weak as a major factor. “Indian companies provide a terrible experience for customers, especially people from Delhi NCR. They even do not know how to speak, they are aggressive, exaggerated, and behave like a customer who has no idea of ​​work.” They also blamed the fraud in the center of communication and social media trends to destroy the reputation of India, noting that countries like Vietnam and the Philippines show more reliable alternatives.

The most prominent commentator is the most flagrant difference in the methods of communication between Indian and Western teams. “I was appointed to a project under the leadership of an American team, and the way they spoke to each other was amazing. Now, I am in a team with an Indian progress, and the way we talk – even between us – is ridiculous.”

A third user, an Indian who lived abroad for 20 years, said they are actively avoiding business with Indian companies, especially those in northern India. Supreme complaints included excessive bargaining, lack of basic etiquette, and a sense of entitlement. “They are negotiating in an unreasonable way, and they will not attend the meetings they requested, and they believe that being a customer means that they can be difficult as they wish – even if it is unrealistic.”

The problem of global perception

Another user noted that Indian commercial awareness – especially emails and calls – is often rejected as unwanted messages. “For most of the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, the Middle East, and anz, Indian emails and calls are anti -random mail calls, so they are not open to talk.”

An American businessman also drew his royalty and called his experiences with Indian customers “Kabous”. He described them as “very cheap, very demanding, not elegant, and arrogant,” adding, “It is not a generalization. All of them.”

While the thread was distinguished by a mixture of perspectives, it emphasized the problem of the increasing vision of Indian companies. Whether the bias are justified or unfair, the discussion indicates that trust and professional competence remain major challenges in the global market.