Ange PostCoglou insists on responding to Boos to Spurs lovers whose interpretation of Chelsea Hease | Football news

AnglyCoglou says his response to Boing Tottenham fans in his defeat 1-0 to Chelsea has offended his interpretation.

Spears chanted, “You don’t know what you are doing,” at their boss, under the extinguishing of the Greeks, replacing Lucas Bergval with Pape Sarr immediately after their backward team and did not score a shot on target.

When SARR scored from the range in just five minutes, postecoglou turned to Tottenham fans and it appears to be a cup of ears while some were seen as a response to Boos. The target was excluded after a long VAR examination.

But postecoglou was concerned about this proposal and insisted that he just wanted the fans to enjoy the moment, feeling that if the goal had calculated the game momentum, he would have turned to his team.

In response to a question about the accident, the Spears coach said: “It is incredible how things are interpreted. We just registered, I just wanted to hear them chanting.

“We have had a difficult time and thought it was a cracked goal. I wanted to be very excited.

“I felt at that point that we could continue and win the game. I just felt that the momentum was (going) on ​​our way.

“This does not bother me. It is not the first time that they scream at alternatives or decisions. That’s good, they are allowed to do this, but we scored a goal, we only scored the equalizer.”

When asked if he risked preparing fans by obtaining this response, postecoglou added: “You know what? I am in this separation with the world these days who knows, maybe you are right. But this is not what my intention was.”

Postecoglou, the VAR’s voice critic, was angry at the length of the timeline that Krij Pawson spent thinking if he would give Sarr’s goal.

The official in the field was sent to his screen after SARR connected to the MOises Caedo leg at the moments before his strike, which could have been the Tottenham equalizer.

It took the Pawson referee for four minutes to reach a decision that the target should be canceled, making postecoglou a question about whether it was a clear and clear error.

“Who cares if it is a mistake or not? There are a lot of very similar accidents there,” said Boskoglu.

“What is the goal of having a judgment there? Clear and clear to me Do you go to the screen? You see it,” Oh my God, I missed that. “

“I mean, all of us – not me, because I am very honest about it – but everyone accepts it. It will be ruled by artificial intelligence soon.

“We may dispense with the players at some point. Someone will come in a genius way just because there is a football game without participants because the referees do not judge.”

“If anyone thinks that when a fleeing is brought, we will sit for six minutes with a microscope, this is not relevant whether it is wrong or not. It is completely not related.”

PosteoCglou suggested that there is a lack of consistency to make decisions because it apparently indicated a decision not to give the midfield from Everton James Tarkowski a red card in Derby Meseyside after reviewing VAR.

He added: “Jared Gillett was in a var. Perhaps if Jared Gillett was in the past, it would have been a different result because, again, he believed, to explain everyone. But I don’t like it, my friend. I never liked it.”