Allowing judges to obstruct Trump is a threat to national security: expert

Federal judges who tried to place barriers on the road to the president Donald Trump It can endanger national security efforts.

“It is unbelievable that a judge Ragg is endangering our national security when they prevent this executive procedure without any legal basis,” said Alfonso Aguilar, head of the American Citizenship Office and the director of participation of Spanish origin in the American Principles Project. “Employment of High Law is essential for foreign actors to try to engage in criminal behavior in our country.”

Comments come after Judge James Pasperg, who was appointed before Former President Barack ObamaHe issued an order on Saturday to stop one of Trump’s rapid deportations to the alleged Venezuelan gang members.

However, the matter did not follow the administration, which argued that the journey was already in the air before getting an order from the judge, which prompted Boasberg to hold a hearing on Monday, which was set for one day for the deadline to provide more information about the trip, such as the number of people who were carrying it and a number of people who were removed “on” on the basis “on” Trump’s budget in 1798.

Who is James Boasberg, the American judge at the Trump Deport efforts?

The verb, which was last called during World War II, The President provides broad powers for imprisonment or deportation of foreign citizens during the war period.

A Trump advertisement claimed on Saturday that members of the Gang to the Venezuelan Gang, TDA, were “running an irregular war and are making hostile actions against the United States,” to follow the Trump step last month to appoint many drug gangs, including TDA, such as “foreign terrorist organizations”.

This step I paid a suit It was submitted by the American Civil Liberties Union, which eventually led to Pasperg’s decision to issue a 14 -day restriction that stops deportation under the law.

However, Aguilar believes that lawsuits are part of a broader strategy by the president’s opponents to reduce his administration, on the pretext that left -wing groups have participated in “shopping in the forum” for judges who believe he would be a political sympathy for Trump’s resistance.

“We have seen this since the beginning of the administration, in every one executive order, certainly about the procedures for enforcement of immigration, is going to shop in the forum, and they are looking for a federal boycott judge who knows that he will be sympathetic to trying to prevent an order or action from the administration.”

William Jacobson, a law professor at Cornell University and founder of the Equality Protection Project, told the Fox News Digital that the direction of judges that prevent Trump’s orders raises serious legal questions.

Trump’s policy on border players enables the use of “maximum consequences”, the border agent tells Fox

“This has been a problem since the beginning of the second administration, Trump,” said Jacobson. “There was a very organized effort to dump the administration in Lawfare, link it and freeze the executive branch mainly.”

Jacobson argued that there was already “a number of rulings” that could be “exceeded the limits of the separation of power”, which caught the attention of four judges in the Supreme Court.

“The courts are not supposed to rule on political cases,” said Jacobson. “The courts are supposed to rule on legal rights. I believe that the argument of the administration is, and they are presenting this argument in the circle of the capital, in the event of the emergency that has now been informed, that if the judge can interfere in something like this, can the judge ask the government to behave in politics abroad?”

Jacobson believes that the only way to correct the position of the administration is for the Supreme Court to intervene, which made clear guidelines for the lower court judges about what they can and cannot judge.

Click here to get the Fox News app

Agilar also believes supreme court He will need to intervene, although he emphasized that the delay at the same time may continue to clarify the troubles of national security.

“If you send a clear message to these individuals that if you come here to commit a crime or engage in terrorism, we will hold you. We will remove you immediately,” he said. “This is a strong form of this type of behavior. So it has an impact on the administration’s efforts to protect our country’s security.”

Alex Schemel from Fox News Digital contributed to this report.