ACLU is sued the government to reach Doug’s records

American Civil Liberties Union Federal lawsuit filed Monday against the American Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Ministry of Affairs of the Veterans (VA). In a lawsuit, the American Civil Liberties Union accuses the FOIA Violating Acts by ignoring the requests of the American Civil Liberties Union and subsequent appeals to obtain information related to what is called so -called Ministry of Governmental efficiency (Doug) “attempt or actual access” to sensitive federal databases.

The American Civil Liberties Union began to follow the documents under the Federal Transparency Law in February, as a wireless I mentioned for the first timeIn response to reports that DOGE’s Elon Musk customers were seeking to reach personal databases belonging to the citizens of the United States, including the US Treasury Department that contains “millions of social security numbers, bank accounts, business resources”, and more.

During the past few months, extensive reports before Wireless Other outlets revealed Dog’s attempts to arrival and analyze Sensitive data Federal employees, the American public, and immigrants to the United States.

In her complaint, the American Civil Liberties Union argues that Dog’s access to very sensitive information about Americans and financial health raises “severe concerns” because of the “extraordinary damage” that can result from any unauthorized use of these files. According to the complaint, ACLU pressure on SSA to accelerate the publication of public records associated with the work of DOGE; A process is permitted when the documents are considered urgent to inform the public of government activities in the center of discussion or great public concern. Among its other materials, the organization cited a letter from Senator Mark Warner in detail the unprecedented confidentiality activities shrouded in Dog.

SSA refused to claim Aclu, but then ignored its attempts to resume, says the US Civil Liberties Union – a required action from SSA to abide by the Freedom of Information Law. The Ministry of Old Warriors Affairs was less responsive, as the US Civil Liberties Union claims; She admitted the request of the American Civil Liberties Union in February and then stopped any other contacts.

“If Dog is making his way to our private data, he forces himself to our private life,” says Lauren Yu, a lawyer who represents the American Civil Liberties Union at court. “Congress has imposed strict private guarantees for some reason, and the Americans deserve to know who has access to social security numbers, their bank account information, and their health records … government representatives cannot continue themselves in secrecy while moving in our most sensitive records.”

The organization’s lawsuit also says through an increased general concern over the continuous batch by Dog to implement artificial intelligence (AI) Systems, “which arouse alarm devices about the possibility of collective monitoring and misuse of this deep personal information.”

Earlier this month, wireless I mentioned The Doge process was trying to use the artificial intelligence tool to implement the VA code, which turns benefits to about 10 million old warriors and their families, including health care and disability payments. The agency’s sources expressed their concerns about the impulsion to implement artificial intelligence, saying that the process had failed to follow the natural procedures and threatened the arrival of old warriors in the United States to the benefits they gained in danger.

“Granting Dog to reach VA data systems will not only violate federal law, but will undermine the essence of VA’s mission to care for the veterans, their families, careers and survivors,” Michelle Fralling, the American Civil Liberties’ Lawyer, said in a statement.

Wireless I mentioned last week Doge collects data from social security management, the Ministry of Internal Security, and the internal revenue service that can create an unprecedented monitoring tool. FOIA files say that ACLU initial requests have been partially claimed for their concerns about using computer matching programs capable of rehabilitation for individuals who use different government databases.

The government’s ability to mutual reference is regulated using databases from various agencies tightly under the American Privacy Law. The law was amended in 1988 to ask the agencies to conclude written agreements before engaging in the computer conformity, and the agencies are required under the law to calculate how these initiatives affect the rights of individuals.

“The federal government cannot avoid accountability by ignoring our legal demands for transparency,” said Nathan Farid Wesler, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union, privacy and technology, in a statement.