A poll finds that 75 % of scientists are considering leaving the United States

A natural survey of more than 1,000 scientists revealed that 75 % of them are considering leaving the United States due to the uncertainty caused by the reduction of federal financing and universities of the Trump administration.

Since Trump’s second term began, he has reduced research financing for universities and federal agencies claiming the name of efficiency, and may have moved the country’s ability to move the needle on scientific discovery.

The recent survey indicates that the administration’s actions may also be exposed to the country’s position as a lovedown to scientists who flee from unconfirmed or explicit hostile situations abroad – the Nobel Prize winner, Albert Einstein, Niels Por, and Nuriko Ferme, among many other scholars who He flocked to the United States When fascist governments rose throughout Europe in the early twentieth century. As the last survey appears, it may cause a chilling effect brain drain As researchers all over the fields, they are looking for more green pastures elsewhere.

According to natureThe numbers looking to leave were higher among researchers early in their career, such as doctoral students and graduate researchers. As the poll shows, 548 out of 690 (79.4 %) of the post -PhD are considering leaving, and 255 out of 340 (75 %) weighing the decision. “Europe and Canada were among the best options to move,” says nature.

Many researchers who Spoil He pointed out that they do not want to leave the United States, but the positions of the administration made it clear that there will be better opportunities to conduct scientific research abroad.

Earlier this month, the University of France AIX Marseille He said Several dozens of scientists in the United States responded to a call that put out a safe port for Americans seeking to leave the country. The researchers who expressed his interest from institutions including Stanford, Yale, NASA, the National Institutes of Health, were among other things.

The second Trump administration has scientific goals firmly at its intersection. Since January, it has been said that the administration has resulted in thousands of federal workers in agencies, including National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST), and Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and National Oceanic and Attrads Administration (Noa), and National Park Service (Nps), and Financing Through a wide range of institutions and Programs.

Assuming the best intentions – only as an intellectual experience, so suspend your lack of certification – the administration is trying to simplify the government by reducing waste spending, and making American agencies and institutions as effective as possible to seek to discover.

You can now reduce yourself from these optimistic reflections. The government’s directives were briefed to get out of the efficiency of these institutions, according to experts who spoke to Gizmodo, and they risk back away from years of progress at home and abroad.

But some cuts are also done in line with Project 2025Conservative movement seeks Cut On environmental protection in the name of freedom and personal freedoms. So, while some layoffs are driven by the bottom line, they are also in a state of insurance with the ideological framework of the administration.

This month, the Trump administration is Consider the financing cutting For local HIV prevention – Trump’s reliable agenda has explicitly regained its first term to combat HIV, with the aim of eliminating the virus locally by 2030.

Funding changes in Lockstep occur with the cultural transformations that the administration urges, especially through the White House passion dismantling Programs and language that defends diversity, fairness, and integration (Dei), which has become the lightning rod in conservative circles as a dance man who represents the “waking” agenda.

Last week, NASA watch I mentioned for the first time that the “Sewerage Squad” from NASA was The graphic novels have been removed From the agency’s website, which narrated the fictional story of the first woman walking on the moon. No woman has gone on the moon, although Artemis tasks will change that – although she is now Less If this is the agency’s priority.

If the United States wants to keep its status as a reason for scientific discovery, bright and attacking minds must show that there is an opportunity for them to build their career and become leaders in their fields. During the past few months, the Trump administration has dispelled it from this idea, and it seems that it will continue its agenda, which is a full jacket.