JK Rowling takes a blow to Emma Watson, Daniel Radclif and Robert Green

The famous author has a hidden tweet on X, quoting a post of actors who destroy a movie.

In the past, Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Robert Green criticized Rolling’s views on sexually transformers, a step that reached their relationship.

Rolling is famous for her accidental tweets on X, as she shares her statements on various issues.

Recently, it seemed to be aimed at Radcliffe, Watson and Grint, the former stars of children who played major roles in direct adaptation to Harry Potter.

I started with the participation of a asked, “What actor/actress immediately destroys a movie for you?”

Then Rolling responded with a hidden note, quoting the post writing“Three guesses … sorry, that was irresistible.” She also added three laughing expressive symbols after her comment.

The author of the book did not convey any movement to clarify what it means with the observation, which made the fans only more speculation in fuel that it was referring to Radcliffe and his participating stars.

In the comments section, Rolling fans added to the hidden comment with statements that calm down the “Harry Potter” trio.

“Three guesses?

Another colleague commented: “I agree with you. As a person who grew up with this series, it was very disappointing how these three were.”

Another person wrote, “There is a beauty of your humor spirit; it’s the brutal honesty that makes it intermittent. Such shame Daniel, Emma, ​​and anything you call the best magic trick that turns out to be disappeared.”

Meanwhile, some users expressed their dissatisfaction with Rolling’s observation.

“Elegant. A real. There are better ways to attract attention than trying to be a 30 -year -old beef.”

Despite their joint success, Rolling and Trio “Harry Potter” have had a tense relationship in recent years, mainly due to her position on transnational issues.

According to Daily MailLast year, it publicly announced that it could not “forgive” Radcliffe, Watson, or other celebrities who support the transgender movement, which she claimed was “determined to erode the rights of women who have achieved hard.”

“Celebrities who embraced the intention of intention to erode the rights of women who have achieved hard and who used their joy platforms in the transfer of minors can save their apologies for those with shock and weak women who rely on one sexual spaces,” Rolling wrote on X at the time.

She later added: “Children have been irreversibly harmful, the thousands of them are complicit, not only in paramedics, but in the mouthful mouth, the undoubted media, and satirical companies.”

Rolling has continued to treat the movement as a scandal that would feel “consequences” for decades and multiplied more than her supporters.

“I have done everything you can to hinder research and distortion,” she added.

On a number of occasions, Rolling made controversial publications consider many to be offensive to the transgender community.

At some point, she claimed that transgender children are not present after a user criticized her online because of her “hateful focus on converted children.”

“There are no unpopular children,” Rolling wrote at mail. “There is no child born in the wrong body.” There are only two people like you, ready to sacrifice the health of the palace to support your belief in the ideology that will lead to greater harm than lobes and wrong memory syndrome combined. “

In another publication, the controversial author blamed the doctors and social media for promoting the “ideas” of children.

“Children watch Tiktok videos for surgeons who sell the idea that bodies can be modified like LEGO. Schools confirm children’s identities crossing the appearance of parents.”

Rolling also noticed, “Many parents are struggling to protect children from a population who tells them that anxiety about puberty, sex and growth can be repaired by lifelong dependence on major drugs and doctors who make Frankstein seem moral.”