The first day, Trump takes a hasty position on China to new horizons Donald Trump News

Taipei, Taiwan – When US President Donald Trump began his first term in 2017, he started implementing the most economic policy of China for decades.

In the first 100 days of his second term, Trump faced Washington with Beijing to greater horizons, where he developed a strong commercial agenda that led to an actual trade ban between the two largest economies in the world.

The American customs tariff on most Chinese commodities increased to 145 percent, as the rate increased to 245 percent on some elements, while the gaps that previously allowed Chinese exporters were closed to evade the existing tariffs.

China imposed 125 percent definitions on most American commodities in response, as well as other reprisals such as export controls on critical minerals and the most strict borders on the number of Hollywood films shown in Chinese cinemas.

Trump’s trade war is launched from his first administration, which was a long belief that China and other countries have benefited from its trade relationship with the United States.

“It is somewhat continuing in terms of goals and guidance, perhaps with more design.

The American trade deficit in goods and services amounted to $ 918.4 billion in 2024, with a deficit in goods, which reached a record record of $ 1.2 trillion, according to the Economic Analysis Office.

In the global view of Trump, China is the third largest trading partner in the United States after Mexico and Canada, among the worst exploiters.

“Trump believes that China has obtained a free trip during the era of globalization and took advantage of the American consumer,” Dennis Wilder, a former official and first colleague at the Georgetown University of Dialogue Initiative in World Issues.

))

Trump launched his first trade war with China in 2018 in response to what he claimed that unfair commercial practices and theft of intellectual property by Chinese companies.

Over the next two years, his administration has imposed a tariff on $ 300 billion in Chinese goods, most of which are still in effect after five years.

During his campaign to re -election last year, Trump explained that he would strike China with a more severe tariff if he returns to the White House.

Jeffrey Moon, who served as the assistant of the American commercial actor in China during the era of former US President Barack Obama, said that while Trump’s commercial position to combat the China since January was not surprising, the irregular domain and nature of the customs tariff have taken its monitors, said Jeffrey Moon, who served as the assistant of the American commercial actor in China during the era of former US President Barack Obama.

“Trump was surprised that he was elected in 2016 and was not ready to take office. In 2025, Project 2025 gave him detailed books that include mutual tariffs and that he began to implement his opening speech, Moon, who heads the Chinese Moon Consulting strategies.

Wilder said that most of Trump’s original definitions were kept in place and even expanded by former US President Joe Biden, but the Biden administration drew the United States and China competition as an ideological battle between democracy and authoritarianism, Trump is driven by a different set of values.

He said: “As it became clear in the second chapter, Trump is a geographical economist, and not the head of Jiosterodic.”

“Trump does not seek the demise of President Xi or seeks to separate him from the Chinese economy unless China is unwilling to give the United States what he considers a more fair deal in economic relations,” Wilder added, in a reference to Chinese President Xi Jinping, in reference to the Chinese President Xi Jinping.

“Sustainable” definitions

In recent weeks, Trump and White House officials have publicly said they want to negotiate with China and reduce the rate of tariffs by 145 percent, which US Treasury Secretary Scott Beesint called “non -sustainable”.

Trump said that his administration is in active negotiations with Beijing on trade. Chinese officials insisted that any such talks have not started yet.

Ray Wang, a Washington -based analyst, who focuses on the American -Chinese economic strategy, said Trump’s strategy to maximize the pressure on China can lead to counterproductive results and pushed Beijing towards more “separation” from the American economy.

“Beijing is unlikely to participate in the face of customs tariffs at the siege level and intensify the signing discourse, making efforts to address the economic concerns that policy aims to resolve.”

Marina Zhang, a professor of participation in the Australia of China Relations Institute at the University of Sydney, said that Chinese manufacturers may grow increasingly to other countries to isolate themselves from the American economy.

“For China, this represents the risks and opportunities: While its exporters to the United States are facing immediate pressure, the batch of Beijing is broader to diversify the market – to Asia, Africa and Latin America – gain a new urgency and a new traction,” Zhang told the island of the island.

With the American -Chinese trade war, Trump put his attention on American trade with other countries in general.

Over the past 100 days, Trump struck Mexico and Canada with separate tours of customs tariffs outside the magic.

On April 2, he expanded the trade war to more than 180 countries and regions with the announcement of the so -called “mutual definitions” ranging from 10 and 49 percent.

Trump then stopped the 90 -day customs tariff in anticipation of international negotiations separately, but he continued to push trading partners in China to close the US -registered exports vulnerabilities.

“The difference (from his first term) is that Trump’s Chinese strategy is part of a global economic strategy. For example, because he cuts new trade deals with Japan, South Korea, Singapore, etc., will want to make sure that they do not help China to waive fairness in the trade of the United States of China,” said Wilder, a former White House official, said.

Trump’s final goal is to rewrite the “Washington consensus” that supports free trade and liberalizing the market to one in its form.

Tomson told Al -Jazeera: “The Trump administration changes the nature of its economic and security partnerships, and its relationship mainly to the whole world. This is not specifically directed to China,” Tomson told Al -Jazeera.

“This really relates to Trump’s perception that the United States has benefited from it and has not benefited from globalization, and frankly, it reflects the perception of American voters for the same.”