Direct updates: Mark Carney wins the full term as Prime Minister in Canada on the Trump control platform

The elections were great in many ways, as the candidates and many voters described it as the most important vote in their lives.

President Trump dominated him and his fixed focus on Canada, the closest ally and commercial partner in America. Mr. Trump imposed a tariff on Canadian goods, pushed them towards stagnation, and has repeatedly threatened to include it as a 51st country. Even when the Canadians were heading to the polls on Monday morning, he repeated that desire, with the debate on social media that it would bring economic and military benefits.

Mr. Carney, 60, who promoted himself as a candidate to combat Trump and focuses on his campaign on dealing with the United States, eventually benefited from the position of the American President.

Mr. Poilievre, 45 years old, and conservatives dominated the polls for years, built a platform against liberals and Mr. Trudeau about the argument that made Canada to feel economic distress for a long time.

But they saw their progress from two numbers that evaporates quickly after the aggression of Mr. Trump towards Canada and the resignation of Mr. Trudeau.

The Canadians, who were heading to opinion polls, were busy with the country’s relationship with its neighbor to the south and with the state of economy at home. The ability to bear the costs, primarily on housing, topped the mind, the opinion polls that were conducted before the elections were shown.

But the choice of Canada on Monday also came as a kind of referendum against Mr. Trump and the way in which America’s allies and commercial partners are treated.

It is the second main international election since Mr. Trump reached power, after Germany, and Canada’s treatment of a rupture of the United States is watched closely all over the world.

The elections also highlighted that the brand of Mr. Trump for conservative policy can be transformed into toxic to conservatives elsewhere if they are seen as compatible with his ideological and rhetorical style. Pre -election funds, that Mr. Poilievre, who mocked the “radical waking ideology”, pledged to calm the national broadcaster in Canada and said that he would reduce foreign aid, seems to have lost the two midfield voters.

For Mr. Carney, he won Monday’s amazing moment in his rapid rise in his political institution in Canada since he entered the race to replace Mr. Trudeau in January.

Help a political beginner, but the veterans of the policy industry, the tone of Mr. Carne, the serious challenge and challenges towards Mr. Trump’s aggressive initiatives to influence voters who were considering supporting conservatives, according to opinion polls and some individual voters. His policy appears to be a pragmatic and average, better in line with the mood of Canada after a decade of Mr. Trudeau’s progressive agenda.

There was many evidence on Monday that Mr. Carney’s personality and her background had strengthened the liberals. He is an economic expert at Harvard and Oxford who served as the governor of Canada Bank during the 2008 global financial crisis and England Bank during the exit of Britain from the European Union. He later continued to work on corporate councils and became a pioneering voice in the conscious investment of climate.

Mr. Poilievre and other critics tried to framing Mr. Carney as an vice outside the touch that spent most of his adult life away from Canada and only a little about the country or its people.

They also attacked Mr. Carne for his experience in working in China, which interfered in the Canadian elections, and some of his policy proposals that they said would prove the public finances in Canada and make it difficult for the country’s economy to flourish.

Despite Monday’s victory, the way for Mr. Carney and his new government will be difficult. For beginners, he will actually need to communicate with Mr. Trump and his unpredictable position towards Canada and discuss charged issues, including trade and security.

The voters will need to be shown that the economic policy policy adoption can be used to improve slow economic growth in Canada and constantly high unemployment.