Prince Harry and Meghan praised the “life” of important issues

friend Prince Harry and Megan Markle The two royal couple supported their lives since they retracted their roles with the continued senior members of the royal family.

Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been shot for various reasons since his exit in 2020.

Now, their famous Chef, Jose Andres, criticized the hatred he received, saying that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are using their platforms “to bring voice and life to issues” instead of “living in their cave”.

Talk to The sixth page In City Harvist, the 2025 party: Carnafal in New York City, Jose Andres expressed his confusion about the continuous criticism targeting Prince Harry and Meghan since it retracted their royal duties and moved to the United States

He defended the duo, describing them as a “amazing couple” and indicated that he only wants to “talk about the good things they are doing.”

Al -Tai then indicated that Sussexes could have chosen to be “in their own cave and do nothing” after leaving the royal life, but they used their platforms “to bring voice and life to issues.”

He gave a context of his remarks, and Andres recalled how Harry and Meghan gave help for forest fire survivors in Los Angeles.

“When they were in Los Angeles during the fires, they were really at fires,” added the non -profit chief executive. “When the cameras were not rolling, they were there to listen to people, and they made them feel that they were the most important person in the world.”

Some of the last reaction directed to Prince Harry and Meghan came from Dr. Sophie Chandoca, President of the African Harry Association, Sinbiel.

Last month, after the resignation of the founder of the Invictus games from the organization, Chandauka topped the headlines by describing the brand of the couple as “toxic” in an interview with a bomb.

“The number one danger to this organization is the leading brand in the leading brand,” Dr. Chandoca, before adding that the couple returns from their royal life a decrease in donors to charities and hindered his ability to employ.

“When you start an interview with people, they ask questions about them, well, these mixed messages about the beneficiary.” woman.

She also accused the head of the guardian Harry of bullying and hate women, with her claims and the organization that is now being investigated by the Charitable Committee.

Another individual issued a series of criticism against Harry and Meghan is former Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown.

In chat with TelegraphShe claimed that the Duke and Duchess had a greater positive effect while working under the royal umbrella more than anything they had done since he moved away from ownership.

She said: “He and Megan talk about” doing good “, but what is good do they do? Goodness that you can do as a more powerful ownership.”

Then the veteran journalist described the couple as “disasters tourists”, referring to their visit to California’s forest fire survivors.

She also claimed that the duo had a large “appetite for money”, which she believed to have led them to take “catastrophic decisions”, such as “reserves” notes by Prince Harry and interviewing Oprah.

previouslyBraun Megan criticized the cooking offer, “with love, Megan”, and the former actress’s approach to promoting her life mark in her lifestyle, as it was always.

Speaking of the show, Brown claimed that he was evidence that Megan had a “painful instinct for her mistake” and that she “has never discovered a convincing personality.”

It also used sharp drafting notes when referring to the Meghan’s Lifestyle sign.