Doordash request from the California Supreme Court judge to reject a lawsuit filed by Uber accuses the food delivery company in suffocating competition by intimidating restaurant owners in exclusive deals.
Doordash argues in Its movement Uber’s claim lacks the front on all fronts. On a post on the website On Friday, Doordash said: “The lawsuit is nothing more than a satirical and calculated tactic from a frustrating competitor who seeks to avoid real competition. It is a disappointing behavior from a well -known company one day by competing for the advantages and innovation of its products.”
In its post, Doordash added that it will defend “strongly”, and the company has placed as “competing so far to provide an exceptional value to the merchants.”
A July 11 session was appointed to the California Supreme Court in San Francisco Province.
Uber A lawsuit was filed against Doordash In February. The alleged DOORDASH company, which carries a horse riding, which has the largest share of the food delivery market in the United States, threatens to restaurants with millions of dollars, or remove or reduce the location of companies on the Doordash application.
Uber responded to DooRdash’s request in a statement sent to Techcrunch.
“It seems that the team in Doordash has difficulty understanding the content of Shakwana,” says the statement via Uber. “When restaurants are forced to choose between unfair terms or revenge, this is not a competition – it is coercion. Uber will continue to defend merchants and the equal field. We look forward to providing the facts in the court.”
Uber requested the trial of a jury in its original complaint. The company did not specify the amount of damage it seeks.
Separately, delivery certain Friday, which DooDash offered to buy a European Food Delivery Company for $ 3.6 billion.
https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/GettyImages-1232015093.jpg?resize=1200,800
Source link