The truth must fight before it unites

Digest opened free editor

Rola Khaleda, FT editor, chooses her favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

If you haven’t heard that yet, do not worry, you will do it soon. The calls to “unite the right” are about to become a shield in British policy and dominant graphic music within the Conservative Party departments.

if Local elections next week Go as polls indicate, the UK Reform Party will be confirmed at Nigel Farage as a dangerous political force, capable of winning the seats of the Council, the town and parliamentary elections. The UK will get the Life Maga Party, which replaces the Conservative Party as the main opposition to work.

Britain’s electoral system punishes the preferred diversity. While voting was on one side of the country’s political cuisine. Divide since the replacement of the liberal partyConservatives always guarantee their great tent enough to eliminate a significant competition on the right. Suddenly, this is over.

Opinion polls show a joint share of the Conservative and Reform Party in the mid -1940s, about the current dual workplace. It is clear that these voices are selected will be wrong. But the fear between the right -wing people is that unless they find a way to cooperate in the upcoming general elections, the anti -alignment vote will be divided by Kiir Starmer in the second chapter.

Hence the calls of “the unification of the oath”. At the present time, these are limited to commentators and unofficial conversations that are whispering Robert Jenrik, The leadership competitor was arrested last year, talking about the private sector about the need to end the section.

Jenrik, who believes that immigration is a distinctive issue of today, his preference is to overcome reform by taking its territory. To this end, he presented a series of hardline comments And policies on Migrationand Cultural pluralism and Imagine the Christian victim. But if it is not possible to marginalize the reform, the section must end “somehow”.

Do not delegate. Any convergence is far from his condition if it comes at all. To start, these calls only come from conservatives. After crushing last year, they get third in the polls. Reform, in contrast to that, prosperous. Part of her argument is that conservatives are broken and cannot be distinguished from labor. Farage puts the political agenda of both the two main parties, as it took advantage of the intense disappointment of voters in the belief that he could build a new force to combat waste. His party sees as a real heirs of the “Red Wall” coalition of Boris Johnson.

There is no from both sides with any incentive to Parley now. The two are in a battle for political lands similar to the Russians and Western allies who are competing for the occupation of areas of influence at the end of World War II. Any deal will now be on the wrong conditions for someone. Conservatives still have many more reform deputies and know that an agreement will lead to a permanent rival on the right. They hope so Trump’s anti -feelings Farraj will empty or that his party can explode before the general elections. Finally, the history of the reform leader shows that he is not a man who finds cooperation easy.

Faraj, though, has momentum. Whether or not He believes his own speech About the solution to the conservatives, it is known that the deal that has now been concluded will make the reform the novice partner, and it may have been stone -made to nearly 90 seats as it ranks second at work.

Above all, it is not clear that reform is really a party from the right. It definitely has the right to the right. He is socially conservative and anti -migration. But its popular economies deviate to the left. Farage speaks with free trade and low tax conversation about Britain from the liberal European Union, but the party is Paul and Nativist economically. It supports some nationalization and manufactures manufacturing. Its basic supporters depend greatly on public services.

Conservatives are also an ideological chaos, torn between the immoral economy and the rejection of globalization. Kimi Badnouch is not wrong to say that they need to solve their basic beliefs – their final agenda may be proven after a great difference from reform.

On all of this, “the unification of the right” will become an increased call. If Badnosh is expelled as a leader, the central issue of the battle will be to replace it.

When the issue of water unity is if it accepts that the right to British policy is to reorganize, as in the United States. Many Conservative Party deputies want to maintain their wide coalition. But another point of view is the final option between the most universal global voters of David Cameron, and socially conservative voters, who gathered around Britain’s exit from the European Union.

Few clear in the form of any cooperation. It can range from an implicit electoral agreement in order not to make an effort in the targeted employment seats of each other to the official moral cooperation of CDU/CSU based on various geographical strengths. Genrik previously talked about the Canadian example, as the old conservatives were absorbed by a newer reform party. But this reorganization took 13 years in the opposition.

Both parties first need to know the electoral limits to go alone. The Conservative Party is advised to give up all the talk about the agreements, which appear not only desperate, but also indicates surrender before they are already lost. They are not wrong in fear of division. But even if the alliance is the end result, it is in the interest of both sides trying to break each other first. They will deal with the coming years as the introductory elections – to prove those who provide a stronger challenge to work. The right will not be united without a fight.

[email protected]