The idea that has been overlooked sheds light on Shakespeare’s marriage

Mr. Stegge suggests that Mrs. Shakespeare’s movements should be reviewed to “the potential absence of London instead of her permanent absence.”

The observation of Mrs. Shakespeare was related to money for a child without a father called John, who was a trainee, although not under the famous theater writer, with the last name “Butte” or “Butts”. He called her to pay money that has been kept in confidence for him, a pledge that her husband may have pledged, and pointed to a time “she inhabited in Trinity Lynn”, which Mr. Steps now believes is indicating a site in London.

The book bearing the letter with the text of 1608 was printed by Richard Field, a citizen of Stratford, who was participating in Shakespeare, his neighbor and the first printer, according to Mr. SteGGle. Mr. Stegeli said that “Wastepaper” was commonly used in the confusion of books, and “given the extensive known ties of the field to Shakespeare,” said Mr. Steopri. He added that the response, which appears to come from, appears to be “organized, somewhat similar to business and sarcastic.”

As for John Pots, the child in the letter, his name appeared in the 1607 record of an institution that disciplined disobedient trainees, among other records, and Mr. Stegge said that his title had arisen in the “Shakespeare Personal Network”.

“High risks”, Mr. Stegge writes in his paper. “This message, if she belongs to them, offers a glimpse of Shakespeare together in London, where she participates in social networks and business issues, and on the occasion of this request, and a unified front against imported requests to help poor orphans.”