The Meta Supervisory Council is concerned about the new Meta policies that will harm human rights

On Wednesday, the Meta Supervision Council called on the company to assess the impact of policy change recently negatively on human rights. The council’s request comes in addition to its publication of its first 11 decisions after Meta Si -policy changes At the beginning of the year.

The changes in the Meta policy in January included moderate reform content, raising restrictions on the political issues of the hot button such as immigration, and ending the examination of facts by a third party in favor of the X -style community observations. When announcing the changes of her policy, Mita said her platforms aim to be somewhere “people can express themselves freely” – even if things become ugly. In the video statement, CEO Mark Zuckerberg added that “(w) reached a point where there were many mistakes and a lot of censorship. The last elections are also similar to it as a cultural criticism point towards giving priority again.”

On Wednesday press releaseThe Board of Directors expressed concern about the updated Meta policies, noting that “general information was not shared (there was no general information about due care in the human rights field conducted by the company” before the change. The Meta Board called for addressing the negative effects that its policies may have on societies such as LGBGQ+, including palace and migrants. In addition, the Board of Directors asked Meta to review the effectiveness of the community notes system in particular regarding By combating wrong information.

As for the decisions themselves, the Board of Directors stood with a number of issues, but it did not agree with others, echoing their greatest concern over possible human rights violations. The Board of Directors canceled Meta’s decision to maintain three riots in last summer in the United Kingdom, saying that “the possibility of inciting it to unrest, additional and visible violence is great.” They asked to remove these publications. In separate cases, the Board of Directors also canceled Meta’s decision to maintain the content “including racial fading and generalizing migrants as sexual predators” and pointed to concerns about “ignoring speech for humanity” about the disabled people that the company’s systems failed to discover.

However, the Board of Directors supported some controversial decisions in Meta, including allowing two toiles to access the bathroom and its participation in the bathrooms of the transgender peoples. Although the jobs are “deliberately provocative … they are related to issues of public attention and will not incite violence or imminent discrimination.”

The requests of the Supervision Council come weeks after a former Facebook employee, Sarah Win Williams, I issued a book narrating at the time in the company And monitoring a pattern of Zuckerberg announces new policies without consulting and ignoring the capabilities caused by the platform. Also, just one day after one day that Kevin Systrom, co -founder of Instagram, witnessed a lawsuit against the Federal Trade Committee against Meta. he I mentioned This Instagram received “zero” money committed to Zuckerberg to spend on trust and safety resources after the Cambridge analytical scandal. So, when it comes to safety, Meta does not look good on multiple fronts.

The thing is that the catastrophic effects of human rights are already documented. For example, I played a An important role in the genocide of the Rohingya and Control content systematically About Palestine. Human rights campaign even Recognized The definition changes “will normalize the fight against misleading, misleading, and anti -homosexual density”, and in February, Amnesty International to caution Definition policies may feed that more collective violence and genocide.

The Board of Directors asked to obtain a dead person to assess the impact of its policies cold, but it is not clear what he will really do. After all, the new Meta policies starkly use Dogwhistle terms such as “transgender”. And training materials regarding A newly allowed speech “Migrants are dirty disgust”, “black more violent of eggs”, or “mentally ill people” as examples. Maybe it’s time to consider that Meta policies – their effects – are not supervision.