Google found that she had a monopoly in AD Tech by the Federal judge

Ruling on a federal judge Google owned by the alphabet It has monopolies in the online publisher advertising server and advertising markets.

This ruling was from the American Provincial Court of the Eastern Region in Virginia Leone Bruntka.

In her ruling, she said that Google “deliberately participated in a series of anti -competition actions to acquire the power of monopoly and preserve it in the publisher’s advertising servant and advertising exchange markets to announce the open network offer.”

“For more than a decade, Google has linked the publisher’s advertising servant and exchanged ads together through contractual policies and technological integration, which enabled the company to create and protect its monopolistic powers,” part of Its ruling He said. “Google is firmly monopolistic power by imposing anti -competition policies on its customers and eliminating the desired product features.”

Google Buying Startup Wiz for $ 32 billion

I found a “exclusion behavior” by Google “greatly harms Google’s publishers, the competitive process, and in the end the web consumers.

The federal government and the 17 states that formed the plaintiffs in the case also claimed that Google had been involved in the market of another advertising-advertising networks-but BRINKEMA found their arguments about this insufficient, according to the referee.

The decision wipes the way for another hearing to determine what Google must do to restore competition in the markets of the publisher of the publisher and advertising exchange markets, such as selling parts of its business in another experience that has not yet been set. This is the second ruling that Google violated the anti -monopoly laws, after a similar ruling on an online search.

In August last year, another federal judge found that Alphabet was in violation of federal monopoly laws, which strengthened his dominant position on online searches and relevant ads. A Google Fox Business spokesman at the time told that it had planned to appeal this decision.

Get Fox Business on the Go by clicking here

The Anti -monopoly department at the Ministry of Justice issued a statement saying: “This is a historic victory in the continuous battle to prevent Google from monopolizing the digital public square,” said Public Attorney Pamela Bondi. “The Ministry of Justice will continue to take bold legal measures to protect the American people from encroachments on freedom of expression and free markets by technology companies.”

“The court ruling is clear: Google is a monopolistic player and has offended its monopolistic authority,” said the assistant prosecutor, Abyel Salter of the Anti -Monopolist Department of the Ministry of Justice. “Google’s illegal dominance allows them to oversight and even American voices. At the same time, Google has destroyed the information and its ease that revealed its illegal behavior. Today’s opinion, Google’s hand, emphasizes the online advertising, and increasingly, the Internet itself. I am unusually proud of the allocated public employees who lead their efforts that are not effort to today’s decision.”

After Thursday’s ruling in the case of advertising technology against Google, Li Malholland, Vice President of Google Affairs, said that the company “won half of this case” and “will resume the other half”.

“The court found this Our advertiser tools “Our acquisitions, such as Doubleclick, do not harm the competition. We disagree with the court’s decision on our publisher tools. Publishers have many options and they choose Google because our advertising technology tools are simple, affordable and effective.”

The experiment occurred on Google advertising technology over a few weeks in September last year.

This arose from a lawsuit that the federal government and eight states filed in January 2023. Nine other states joined the lawsuit in April of that year.

The 17 countries are California, Colorado, Concitect, New Jersey, New York, Roud Island, Tennessee, Virginia, Arizona, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampsheer, North Carolina, Washington and West Virginia, according to Bruntka’s rule.

Google must sell Chrome to move to the end of monopoly on online searches, DOJ says

Google is now facing the ability to request two American trials to sell assets or change their commercial practices. One of the two judges in Washington will be tried next week at the request of the Ministry of Justice to make Google sell its Chrome browser and take other measures to end its hegemony in searching online.

Reuters, Fox Business’ Grady Trimble and Eric Revell contributed to this report.