Trump’s plan inside “Get” Greenland: persuasion, not invasion

President Trump’s goal has long been a long -standing demand for Greenland for America to the official American policy where the White House moves forward on an official plan to obtain the Arctic Island from Denmark.

The plan is working to mobilize many cabinet departments behind the years of Speaker of Mr. Trump about the desire for Greenland, whose economic and strategic value has grown with the melodies of warming in the Arctic.

Greenland – 836330 square miles – offers Mr. Trump, a former developer in Manhattan, an opportunity to cancel one of the greatest real estate deals in history.

Danish officials angrily insist that the densely populated island is not offered for sale and cannot be included. But Mr. Trump explained his determination to control it.

He said in a speech to Congress last month: “We need Greenland for national security and even international security, and we are working with all concerned to try to obtain it,” he said in a speech to Congress last month.

“In one way or another, we will get it,” added Mr. Trump.

The National Security Council met at the White House several times to put the words of Mr. Trump into practice, and recently sent specific instructions to multiple arms of the government, according to an American official.

The full details of the plan is unclear. However, although Mr. Trump’s hints on the potential use of force, the deliberations led by the Security Council did not consider the military options seriously.

Instead, this policy emphasizes persuading coercion, and is characterized by a public relations effort aimed at persuading Greenland’s population of 57,000 who should ask to join the United States.

Mr. Trump’s advisers discussed the use of advertising campaigns and social media to the influence of public opinion on the island, according to another person who was briefed on this.

It may be an arduous battle. In the elections last month, an opposition political party prefers rapid independence and close relations with the United States ended in second place, but with a quarter of the vote only.

The official said that the American messaging campaign will include an impossible attractiveness of Greenlands’s joint heritage with the indigenous people in Alaska, about 2,500 miles away.

The residents of Innit Greenland descended from people who migrated from Alaska hundreds of years ago, and the official language of the island is Derivative That grew up in the Arctic Canada.

Mr. Trump’s advisers have already begun to put their public cause, on the pretext that Denmark was a poor guard for the island, that the United States alone can protect it from infringement by Russia and China, and that America will help Greenlands to “become rich”, as Mr. Trump has developed.

The Trump administration also mentions Greenland that the United States has previously defended it.

Last month, Mr. Trump was published 90 seconds video On social media, to celebrate the “blood and courage” of the American forces that took sites on the island during World War II to prevent the Nazi invasion of fear after Germany occupied Denmark.

Although Denmark was hoping to leave the American forces after the war, it has never done, and the United States still maintains a military base there.

The Trump administration is also considering financial incentives for Greenlanders, including the possibility of replacing $ 600 million in subsidies given by Denmark Al Jazeera with an annual dam of about $ 10,000 per Greenlander.

Some Trump officials believe that these costs can be compensated by new revenues from the extraction of natural resources in Greenland, which include rare ground minerals, copper, gold, uranium and oil.

Trump officials argue that the American and industrial capital may be able to reach the largely unexploited mineral wealth in a way that Denmark cannot. “This is related to critical minerals,” Michael Waltz, National Security Adviser to Mr. Trump, told Fox News in January. “This is about natural resources.”

But analysts do not agree globally that it will be easy to benefit from mining in areas still on the island. He explained great expenses for American voters as Mr. Trump cost the richest man in the world, Elon Musk, with the federal government cut a trillion dollars.

Mr. Trump’s interest in Greenland is not new: he was serious enough in his first term to charge national security officials to explore the idea. But after he started discussing it publicly, Greenland officials dismantled and Mr. Trump did not follow this idea, which was treated as a brutal imagination.

Since his second election last fall, Mr. Trump has re -wanted his desire with greater enthusiasm. “Let’s accomplish it,” a student.

“President Trump believes that Greenland is a strategic location, and it is confident that Greenland would better protect the United States from modern threats in the Arctic,” said Brian Hughes spokesman Brian Hughes.

Mr. Hughes indicated that Mr. Valz and Vice President JD Vance recently visited Greenland and “put the important issue for a partnership between Greenland and the United States to establish a long -term peace at home and a joint prosperity abroad.”

Some analysts say the idea of ​​integrating Greenland into the United States, or at least developing much closer relationships with the island, is less absurd than it may appear.

This is largely due to climate change, which is the melting of resource -rich areas and making them more commercially applicable. The warmer temperatures also opened new naval routes across the Arctic Pole for Commercial Shipping – as well as for Chinese and Russian military ships.

But Mr. Trump pledges to control Greenland in one way or another for many of the world, such as raw imperialism, as well as his talk about the restoration of the Panama Canal and even the conversion of Canada into the American “51”. If persuading efforts in the administration fails to achieve results, Mr. Trump can escalate his tactics.

Many American presidents have thought of trying to get Greenland. The Truman Administration, which has shook Nazi threats to the island during World War II, presented Denmark, the equivalent of one billion dollars in 1946.

Denmark practiced various forms of control over Greenland for several centuries and accepted them as part 60 percent of DenmarkWhich also manages defense and foreign policy. Many Greenland leaders support independence, But it differs from when it should happen And whether approaching the United States.

For their part, Denmark leaders are shocked and angry because of Mr. Trump’s talk about buying or seizing the island, and insisting that Greenland must determine their fate freely. During a visit to Greenland last week, Prime Minister Metty Friedriksen of Denmark condemned the “pressure and threats” of the Trump administration, saying that “you cannot include another country.”

Amid the fierce resistance of Denmark, the Trump administration turns into the direct flirtation of Greenland.

Mr. Trump said: “In his speech to the people of Greenland during his speech to Congress,“ We ​​strongly support your right to determine your future, and if you choose, we welcome you in the United States of America. “

He said, “We will keep you safe.” “We will make you rich.”

Mr. Vans made a similar note on March 28 during a visit to an American military base on the island.

Speaking to journalists there, Mr. Vance expected that “Greenlands will choose, through self -determination, to become independent of Denmark, and then we will hold talks with the people of Greenland from there.”

Mr. Trump and his senior officials have not yet had public relations between the inhabitants of the Innien in Greenland and the American Inuits in Alaska, as imagined in the plan approved by the National Security Council.

However, this dynamic was referred to in December by Robert O’Brien, who served as a national security adviser to Mr. Trump.

“We can allow Greenland from him, and Greenland can become part of Alaska. I mean, that the indigenous people in Greenland are closely related to the Alaska people, and we will make it part of Alaska,” said Mr. O’Brien in an interview with Fox News, in an interview with Fox News.

It is not clear how strong this message is on the island. While Alaska is involved in the profits of the oil wealth in her mandate in the form of annual checks for residents, members of her hemorrhage bear an impartial and bad poverty.

Danish leaders argue that a campaign in the United States is already destroying the America coalition after World War II with Denmark.

“We have looked at you,” said Ms. Friedrixen about the United States during her visit to Greenland this month. “You inspired us. I stood as a guard on the free world.”

“But,” she added, “When you demand a part of the kingdom’s lands – when we are under pressure and threats – what should we think in the country we liked for many years?”