The biotechnology company, somewhat, revived the long wolf

It is a severe and exhausted monster that disappeared thousands of years ago, except for technical performances in the books and on the screen, as in game of thrones.

Or, perhaps, it is just a gray wolf with some adjustments.

American Biotech Company COLOSSAL BIOSCINCES issued a sudden advertisement on Monday, claiming that it had returned the pulmonary wolf from the dead, thus achieving the first successful “removal” of the company.

Colossal has offered videos of the luxurious white wolf lines wandering in its 2000 -acre habitats at an unknown location in the American north, which represents a great victory for the company that is also working to revive the Sufi mammoth, Dodo and Tasmanian Tiger.

But some scientists say that although the presence of wolves is an impressive achievement, they are not fully announced.

“I want to see some of the papers that the peers reviewed coming out of this, to get a better feeling than what was already done and what is known and what was not done,” said Hank Grilli, director of the Law Center at Stanford University and Biology.

He says that seeing the puppies put a smile on his face, and was a welcome surprise in a dark news scene.

But from his point of view, creation is more than a “terrible wolf.”

“I think it is important for people to remember that these are not harsh wolves. There are gray wolves with some terrible properties of wolf.” “On the other hand, they seem to be closer to terrible wolves more than anything else that anyone sees for 13,000 years, and this is great. They are cute like hell.”

Once hunted a large prey

The large types of wolf wandered in the Americas for more than 100,000 years, before it became extinct about 13,000 years ago.

It was believed that he was hunting a large prey, such as horses, aging, and giant lazies, and it has largely disappeared because its prey had become extinct – partly due to hunting by humans.

The chief scientific official of Colosel Beth Shapiro says that scientists extracted the 13,000 -year -old DNA and the 72,000 internal ear bone from the terrible skull of the wolf, and extracted and the DNA sequence to assemble genomics.

They decided that the gray wolf was closest to it – “99.5 percent identical” in the DNA, as it says – similar to appearance but larger and more muscular and with a lighter colored coat, a wider skull and stronger dismantling.

Then the scientists changed the gray wolf cells to give them terrible wolf features, as they modified 20 at 14 genes before creating embryos and planting them in large local fishing dogs.

Shapiro said that three of the eight dogs used as alternative mothers gave birth to harsh wolves, then mothers were adopted unknown through the American human society – “so, somewhere there, there are families who adopted a dog who gave birth to a harsh wolf, and they do not know.”

Holosal says that two males, Romulus and Remos, were two sons on October 1 – they are now placed in the early stages of adolescence – while Khaldisi, a female, was born on January 30, and she is in the era where she can be known to children.

Kevin Campbell, a professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Manitoba, says, while puppies resemble severe wolves, it is difficult to know how similar them is physiological.

He said: “They liberated 20 different mutations … which affected 14 gene. This is placed in the perspective, perhaps the wolf is 22 or 23,000 different genes.” “Now what we have is 99.999 percent gray wolf, with a percentage wolf .001 percent.”

Disclosure patterns

Shapiro admits that the puppies are not just like bitter wolves of metabolism, but he says that the idea was to create something that has the same distinctive features that can live a healthy life in the modern era.

“When we think about getting rid, we do not imagine that we will re -create something genetically identical to something that was alive,” she told CBC News. “This is impractical and perhaps not what we want either. Instead, we want to restore these apparent patterns, extinct characteristics that have determined this type.”

The CEO of Colossal Ben Lamm says that the project started about two years ago, as a way to make people talk about wolves and save the endangered red wolf.

On this front, the Dallas -based private company announced at the same time on Monday that it also produced four cloned red wolves using a new technology that has been developed while working on terrible wolves.

Lamm says that many indigenous American societies have expressed interest in re -introducing severe wolves on their lands, but she says that this will be a complex process that requires intensive consultation with land owners, governments and other interests.

Currently, Colossal is closely studied by harsh puppies and has no plans to introduce them to wild wild.

Some have criticized the collection cancellation projects in Colossal to attract attention away from the least glamorous work carried out by organizations designated to preserve the existing species and their habitats.

Joe Walleton, head of global conservation at the Wildlife Preservation Association, says that fading projects can inspire people to think about preserving species, and does not oppose the use of technology as a single tool to help preserve species such as red wolf.

But most species, he says, can recover from an “incredible rate” if their habitats are reserved and left alone.

“We have tigers, we have black, we have wolves themselves, we have these great predators that range in this land that are in trouble and need to help us,” he said.

“Sometimes we feel a little thing and forget that what we already have on Earth is the most prominent species that the world has ever seen.”