President Trump said on Monday that the United States will participate in “direct” negotiations with Iran next Saturday in another effort to restore the country’s nuclear program, saying that Tehran would be “in great danger” if it fails to reach an agreement.
If there are direct talks, it will be the first official and face negotiations between the two countries since Mr. Trump Abandoning the nuclear agreement Obama era Seven years ago. It will also come in a dangerous moment, as Iran has lost air defenses around its main nuclear sites due to accurate Israeli strikes last October. Iran is no longer dependent on the forces of the agent in the Middle East-Hamas, Hezbollah and the Assad government now full of Syria-to threaten Israel with revenge.
In a social media position, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragshi confirmed that the talks will take place on Saturday in Amman – but he said they will be indirect, which means that the brokers will work with the two sides. “It is an opportunity as much as it is a test. The ball is in the American court,” said Mr. Aragchchi.
Based on the command of its supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khawnai, Iran refused to sit with US officials in direct nuclear negotiations since Mr. Trump withdrew from the last agreement. After Mr. Trump spoke on Monday, three Iranian officials said that Ayatollah Khawni had reported his site to allow direct talks.
Officials said that if indirect talks on Saturday are respected and productive, direct talks may occur, the officials said. Officials asked not to be named because they were not authorized to speak publicly.
However, Iran is sure to resist the dismantling of its entire nuclear infrastructure, which gave it the “threshold” ability to make fuel for a bomb within weeks – and perhaps a full weapon for months. Many Iranians have begun to speak frankly about the need for the country to build a weapon because it has proven to some extent in a series of missile exchanges with Israel last year.
He sits next to Mr. Trump on Monday during a visit to the United States, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisted that any resulting deal must follow what he called the “Libya Model”, which means that Iran will have to disintegrate and ship it from the entire country in the nuclear infrastructure. But many nuclear enrichment equipment in Libya was not integrated before it was delivered to the United States in 2003; Iranian nuclear infrastructure works for decades and spreads throughout the country, many of which are deep in the Earth.
Mr. Netanyahu was strangely quiet during a long question and answers session with correspondents, in the sharp contrast with his last visit to Washington, two months ago. After a few preliminary statements, he was largely spectators, as Mr. Trump has populated against European countries that he said he “drunk” the United States and threatened more definitions punishment against China unless he reflects his threat to a revenge tariff by Tuesday. He also clarified the water about whether his induction structure was supposed to be a permanent source of US revenues or just taking advantage of negotiations.
Mr. Netanyahu left the Oval Office without public commitment to Mr. Trump to survey the 17 percent tariff he placed on Israel, one of America’s closest allies. Obtaining such a commitment was one of the main goals of his journey, as well as securing more weapons for the war against Hamas in Gaza and the Israeli military action in the West Bank. If the two men discuss the Israeli or joint Israeli military options against the main Iranian nuclear sites, they will not give any indication of this during their public comments.
The closest Mr. Trump was to say: “I think everyone agrees that doing a deal would be better to do what is clear. It is clear not something I want to participate in, or frankly that Israel wants to participate in it, if they can avoid it.” Once again, Mr. Netanyahu did not say anything, as Mr. Trump, who controls him, barely allowed him to obtain a word.
“So we will see whether we can avoid it, but it can be a very dangerous area, and we hope these conversations will be successful,” added Mr. Trump.
Mr. Trump is, to some extent, solve a problem of making it. The 2015 nuclear agreement has shipped Iran from the country from the country 97 percent of enriched uranium, leaving small quantities in the country, and the equipment needed to produce nuclear fuel. President Barack Obama and his big aides at the time said the deal was the best they could extract. But it left Iran with the equipment and know -how to rebuild it after Mr. Trump withdrew from the agreement, and today it has enough fuel to produce more than six nuclear weapons in a relatively short time.
How long will it take to be a matter of conflict: The New York Times reported in early February that the new intelligence indicated that a secret team of Iranian scientists was exploring a faster style, if Cruder was to develop an atomic weapon. Mr. Trump was supposed to have been briefed on these results, which came at the end of the Biden administration, and added the insistence to the talks. Administration officials say they will not participate in long negotiations with Tehran.
Mr. Trump’s sudden announcement of what he called the “Supreme Level” meeting exploded on the Iranian media. The reaction of some Iranians to enthusiasm, saying social media that they hope that negotiations will solve their economic problems and avoid the threat of war, which has become sharp in recent months.
“The way we see, Trump’s comments about the negotiations were a clear and strong reference to both Israel and Iran,” said Mahdi Rahma, a conservative political analyst close to the government, in a telephone interview. “He puts the brakes on the Israeli plan for military strikes, and he explicitly sends a positive pulse to Iran, which is preferred by diplomacy and wants to solve our problems.”
Earlier in the day, Foreign Ministry spokesman Asmaeel Baghri told Iranian media: “Iran’s offer to indirect negotiations was a generous and wise presentation, given the date of the case and trends related to nuclear negotiations in the past decade. We are focusing on what we offer.”
Iran appears to come to the table at all as a great recognition of its weak condition. Its nuclear facilities were never weak. In addition to the Iranian air defenses in October, Israel also destroyed missile production facilities as Iran mixes missile fuel. Therefore, Iran was the ability to produce new missiles temporarily.
But it is quite possible, as Nuclear experts say, the maximum of Iran feels that it can give it not to come close to the demand that the National Security Adviser to Mr. Trump, Michael Waltz, talked about: the complete dismantling of his nuclear facilities.
This means ending Natanz’s nuclear enrichment site, which attacked the United States and Israel with the Citrosinit Cyber, 15 years ago, which has been exposed to Israel since then. This means destroying the Fordow fertilization site, deep under a mountain on a military base. This means dismantling a group of other facilities, which spread throughout the country, under the eyes of international negotiators.
If Mr. Trump has not fully dismantled, he will have to face questions about whether he has anything more than the Obama administration a decade ago. Mr. Trump rejected this agreement as a “catastrophe” and embarrassment, noting that it would raise all restrictions imposed on Iran’s nuclear production by 2030.
Experts say his challenge now will achieve more than Mr. Obama.
https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/images/icons/defaultPromoCrop.png
Source link