Signature of more than 500 brief companies to support the targeted law firm Trump Donald Trump News

More than 500 lawyers have gathered in the United States to support Perkins Coie LLP, one of the many legal offices that were targeted under President Donald Trump’s management.

In a summary of the amicos submitted on Friday, the law firms accused the Trump administration of following up the “Dramatic Punishment” campaign against legal professionals who represent people and cause a frown.

“Any controversial representation indicates the challenge of the current management (or even causing it to deformity) now brings with it the risk of devastating revenge.”

“Whatever the short -term feature that the administration may gain from the exercise of power in this way, the rule of law cannot bear a long time in the climate of fear that such measures create.”

Perkins Koy It is one of at least four major law firms targeted by Trump with executive orders. And include Wille Suhailand Paul Weiss and Jenner & Block.

Executive orders included widespread accusations, including the fact that law companies participated in “destroying the American principles of the Americans” and “harmful behavior with critical American interests.”

As a penalty, executive orders seek to cancel the necessary security permits for high risk issues that involve sensitive information, as well as preventing legal companies from entering federal buildings such as courts.

Each of the targeted law firms represent a case or a person who spoke with Trump.

In the Perkins Koy case, the president was martyred by the law office on behalf of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, a democracy against Trump in the 2016 presidential race.

Meanwhile, Wilterluel was distinguished for Robert Muller’s employment, the lawyer who was previously working as head of the FBI. During the first period of Trump, Muller was brought as a special consultant at the Ministry of Justice to investigate the alleged Russian intervention in the 2016 elections – an investigation by Trump.

The Amicus summary is on Friday that Trump is seeking to “cow” these law firms – and the smaller companies in the extension – “to submission.”

He pointed out that the operations of security permits and the deprivation of access to federal buildings “threaten the survival of any law firm”, not to mention the intimidation of customers.

Indeed, multiple law offices have negotiated an agreement with the Trump administration – either to lift these sanctions or avoid imposing them in the first place.

On March 20, six days after the executive order, the New York -based law firm Paul Weiss was the first to surrender.

On social media, the president Declare The company agreed to provide “40 million dollars in free legal services over the period of President Trump’s term to support management initiatives”, in exchange for raising the executive order.

Other companies followed their example. infectionand Milbank and Wilki Var and Gallaghar – Three legal offices – each of which offered 100 million dollars in “excellent legal services” for Trump’s favorite reasons. Some colleagues have resigned in those companies since their position in protest.

But Perkins Koy is among the legal offices that fight Trump’s executive orders, describing unconstitutional violations of freedom of expression and the right to legal procedures before the law.

Wilmeerhale and Jenner & Block also launched their legal challenges.

In the Amicus Coie summary, law firms that exceed 500 people have echoed the arguments on which these challenges are based. The Trump administration’s executive was criticized as a threat to everyone’s right to protect law.

“These orders are a serious threat to our system of constitutional rule and the rule of the law itself,” said summary. “The judiciary must act with determination – now – to ensure the stopping of this attack on the executive authority.”

He pointed out that law firms, such as Birkins Koy, employ lawyers and experts from all over the political spectrum.

It is worth noting that the summary comes two days after the Kato Tahrir Institute was raised itself Amicus message In this case, along with the American Civil Liberties Union.

On Friday, the petition referred to the fact that the “founding father” of the United States, John Adams, represented in cases that were unpopular – for example, the British colonists who shot us civilians.

He explained that Adams did this because he believes in the right to equal justice under the law.

“Until now, it was unreasonable for the law office to risk the punitive decline of the federal government for making representations of this kind,” the clearest summary.

The Federal Court system called for a permanent judicial order on Trump’s executive orders.

“Unless the judiciary behaves decisively now, what was exceeding the pale will in a short time becomes a flagrant fact.”