Yoon was removed in South Korea as head of the unrest in the fighting law – national

South Korea The Constitutional Court unanimously removed Yoon Sok Yol from his post on Friday, where he ended his loud presidency and the establishment of new elections, four months after the nation was thrown into the disturbances with a fateful declaration of martial law.

The ruling was crowned dramatically before Yoon, the former public prosecutor who became president in 2022, just one year after entering politics.

In a televised hearing at the national level, the President of the Court, the Chargé d’Affaires of Moon Hyung Bay, said that the seat of the members, who found that Yoon’s actions were unconstitutional and had a great impact.

Moon said: “By declaring martial rulings on the breach of the constitution and other laws, the defendant re -abused government emergency decrees, shocked the people and caused confusion in society, economics, politics, diplomacy and all other fields.”

“Given the negative impact on the constitutional system caused by the defendant’s violation of the laws and its ripped effects, we find that the benefits of supporting the constitution through the defendant’s refusal to exceed the national losses from the president’s refusal,” and the justice concluded.

The anti -Balion demonstrators broke out near the court to cry and dance when the ruling was announced late in the morning. Two women cried embracing, a old man jumped near them on his feet and shouted with joy. The crowd later walked on the streets of Seoul.

Outside Yoon’s official residence, many supporters cried, shouting and screaming at journalists when they saw the news of the referee on the giant TV screen. But they soon adopted after their organization appealed to calm.

“We will not be committed at all!” A protest leader shouted on the stage. “Anyone who accepts this ruling and prepares for the early presidential elections is our enemy.”

No major violence was reported late in the afternoon.

“The political risks related to local polarization and instability in politics remain,” said Lev-Eric Isley, a professor at Iowa University in Seoul. “But the unanimous judgment of the Constitutional Court has removed a major source of uncertainty. Korean government institutions have withstood a volatile mixture of legislative obstacles and executive transgression that constitutes the greatest challenge to democracy in one generation.”

The elections will be held within two months for a new president. But the festivals gap to isolate Yun can hold South Korea’s efforts to deal with decisive issues such as President Donald Trump’s tariff and other “first America” ​​policies.

Yoon said in a statement issued through his defense team that he regretted the level of the public’s expectations, but he stopped accepting the ruling explicitly. There were concerns that he would incite efforts to resist his removal, as he previously pledged to fight to the end.

He added that he will pray for the country and its people. “It was the greatest honor in my life to serve our nation,” Yoon said.

The ruling ruler Yoon said it would accept the decision, but one of Yoon’s lawyer, Yun Cap Keon, described the ruling as “completely incomprehensible” and “pure political decision.”

Prime Minister Han Dac Soo, the Chargé d’Affairs of the country, pledged to maintain public safety and order and ensure a smooth transition to the next administration.

Li Jae Meong, the leader of the liberal opposition Democratic Party, presents the preferred candidate early to win the upcoming presidential elections, although he faces several trials for corruption and other charges.

“It will be an arduous battle for the Conservative Party to win early presidential elections,” said Deion Kim, chief analyst at a new American security center in Washington. “If he wins me, South Korea’s foreign policy will seem completely different from what the United States and similar countries enjoy thinking during Yun’s presidency due to the demands of the progressive base.”

He welcomed me the rule and the proportions of the people of South Korea for “protecting the Republic of Democracy”.

Going now

• 1.2 million dollars lost throughout Canada in the fraud of fake functions of fake Amazon

• “It is a golden ticket”: US physicians explain the desire to come to Canada

The martial law did not last only six hours, but it left behind a political crisis, shaking the financial markets and the concern of diplomatic partners in the country.

After announcing the martial law late at night on December 3, Yoon, a governor, sent hundreds of soldiers to the National Assembly controlled by the liberal opposition, election offices and other sites. Special operations soldiers broke the windows in the association and wounded with the demonstrators, which sparked memories of shock to the previous military bases in the country between many South Koreans.

Sufficient number of lawmakers, including some of the ruling party, managed to enter the association to vote on the unanimous Yun decree.

Some senior army and police officers to the association witnessed that Yoon ordered them to withdraw legislators to prevent voting for his decree or to detention of his political competitors. Yoon says the forces were deployed in the association simply to maintain the regime.

Yun was isolated by the National Assembly on December 14. The association accused him of violating the constitution and other laws by suppressing the activities of the association, trying to detention politicians, and undermine peace throughout the country.

In his final testimony at the Constitutional Court session, Yoon said that his decree was a desperate attempt to attract public support to fight against the “evil” of the Democratic Party, which hindered his agenda, the weakest senior officials and reduced the government budget bill. Earlier, the National Assembly called “Ain for criminals” and “anti -state forces”.

The Constitutional Court, which violated Yoon, ruled the association to demand the lifting of martial law, freedom of political parties and the impartiality of the army. He also said that Yoon’s political road with the opposition was not the type of emergency situation that requires martial law and that the Yun decree lacked the required legal procedures such as deliberations by the official cabinet meeting.

Yun was charged with rebellion in relation to his decree, or a charge to carry a death penalty or a life sentence if convicted. He became the first South Korean president to be arrested or accused while he was in office.

Yun was released from prison in March after a local court in Seoul canceled his arrest. This allows him to try without detention.

His removal from his position also costs the presidential immunity that protects him from most of the criminal prosecutions. This means that he may face other criminal charges, such as abuse of power, regarding his decision in the fighting law, as some observers say.

The Associated Press Foster Klog writer contributed to this report.