Only Fans is to prosecute two men who suddenly realized that they might not speak with real models

Two men came from Illinois Collective lawsuit Against Global Smut Pealdler only, after they reached the awareness of the ego that the messages they were receiving as a result of subscriptions may not already come from their favorite sex operators.

404 media I mentioned originally On the litigation, which was presented on behalf of two prosecutors, M. Brunner and J. Fry. The lawsuit aims at the goal of Fenix ​​Internet, LLC and Fenix ​​International Limited, the mother companies, and accuses them of enhancing wide “deception” against site users. “Prosecutors claim that the defendants have been deceived illegally and incorrectly their fans by allowing third parties to send communications on behalf of the creators in violation of garbage connectors only,” the case says. It also provides for:

Despite the fact that the success of the only one based on a promise of “direct” contacts and “authentic” relationships, they only purpose the plans in which fans are deceived to pay personal interactions with creators who are not “original” at all. These plans include the use of external sources of the position of interaction with fans, as well as other jobs, to “management” agencies by third party.

Gizmodo Contact with only Fans to comment.

that it A well -known fact Many models only do not actually speak with their subscribers. The prominent media covered this phenomenon for years, and it has always assumed that most subscribers know this from work. Brunner also publicly recognizes litigation, participated in a model that had hundreds of thousands of followers. Only on the basis of pure healthy sense, what are the chances that a woman like that has time and resources, or more importantly, the will to answer all the messages of her fans directly?

Only Fans is also the introduction to the potential participation of third -party companies in customer exchange. In fact, the platform “a contract” Between “creators” and “fans”, he explains: “The fan admits that the external parties may help creators to operate their accounts and in the interactions of the creators.” It seems that the inclusion here is clear, but the propaganda lawsuit for Brunner and Fry claims that this contract “suffers from the role that third parties may play in helping creators in their content”, as the fans’ contract “interfering in TOS requires an additional procedure for use separately.

It is almost translated, it seems that the lawsuit says that the fact that the contract is on a web page different from TOS, and therefore, it requires the user to click from one page to another, is unreasonable. Yes, how can you expect to read and understand the conditions of the company’s service and understand it when you are very hungry for the “authentic communications” that you can get with the announced Starlets on its website? It is a good question, but it can be said that it is not a truly the problem of the company.