Elon Musk X requests the Supreme Court to protect users from the US government

Digest opened free editor

Rola Khaleda, FT editor, chooses her favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

Elon Musk has asked X from the Supreme Court from the Supreme Court to protect its users from implementing the American law, and interferes in a case that could force the federal government to issue an order to reach private data.

in Brief X has submitted to the Supreme Court, she is concerned about “wide -ranging” requests, adding that platforms must be coerced “to help governments undermine the privacy of their users.

The support summary, which was presented on Friday, comes in a long -term case provided by James Harper, a encryption user Coinbase. He claims that he was one of the thousands of Coinbase customers whose data was delivered to the internal revenue service as part of a “fishing trip” by the agency in potential tax fraud, in violation of the site’s privacy policies.

Winning the plaintiff in the case, which the Supreme Court has not agreed yet, is yet. Musk It is part – the disguised data that will be delivered by X without “possible reason and special doubts.”

X, which was Bought on Friday By Musk AI XAI, it refused to comment on the deposit.

A person close to X said that the Harper case “is concerned that user’s speech (X) may be reduced if the government is allowed to access user data without a court inspection order.”

They added: “This problem is not specific to X. This means that the constitution does not prevent the government from getting rid of the account of any user on any social media platform or a financial platform.”

The timing of the intervention by X – the only individual company that has brought a summary in the case so far – is noticeable that the Trump administration used public materials on social media to examine migrants.

Ministry of Internal Security last month He suggested expanding the range of social media accounts from visa applicants and those who want to apply for residence in the United States.

A White House spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.

X’s deposit in the case of the Supreme Court also comes as Musk has followed an increasing approach with what is claiming to be government efforts worldwide for social media users.

Since the purchase of X for 44 billion dollars in 2022, “Absolitive Absolist”, who declared himself “removal” requests in Brazil, India and Australia, has been attacked, and clashed with governments and judiciary in those countries.

In the Harper case, it appears that X is concerned that US government agencies can obtain private records for users, using a legal doctrine that gives the law the right to access the information that an individual shares with third parties, even if a judicial order is not issued.

“If Tony Soprano” arranges “with a” commercial partner “, any side promises are not implemented, including promises to maintain confidentiality.” Soprano.

“But the conditions for service agreements will not be considered between users and Coinbase or X Corp illegal contracts, just because some users … are properly subject to government investigation.”

X collects financial statements from brands that announce its basic system as well as users who offer or subscribe to Paywalled content.

The platform is looking further than that to financial services. X’s lawyers in the summary indicated that CEO Linda Yakarino recently announced plans to launch X Money, a digital payment service and a counterpart to a counterpart, with Visa as her first partner.

The X summary has been presented by lawyers at Pacific Legal Foundation, a public interest law company for decades fighting for civil freedoms. Its employees previously Critical musk In other things.

“It could have a permanent impact on the criteria through which the government can access customer information about the exchange of encryption and other platforms without a possible reason,” said Chris Giancarlo, a lawyer in Wilki Var, whose company is another supporter of the PONO case.