The American law firms worry about the Trump “Revenge Program”, where the judges cite the increasing threats

On Wednesday, the Public Prosecutor in many democratic countries condemned what he called the “Gloripation influence” of US President Donald Trump’s executive orders targeting law firms and calling for isolating federal judges, and describing the ongoing attacks as an aftermath against political opponents.

In what they described as “an open speech to the legal community”, more than 20 state lawyers across the country and in Washington, DC, said that the procedures “represent a clear threat to the justice system and our profession.”

Trump attacked major law firms because of their work for his political and legal opponents and the policies of internal diversity.

Often, executive orders stopped security permits for some companies’ lawyers, shorten their access to buildings and government officials and threatened to cancel the federal contracts held by their customers.

The presidential procedures targeting law firms sought “revenge for ideological differences, and to punish companies for the actions of individual lawyers who represent the disabled clients and supporters of the president.” She said the message.

The state prosecutor expressed his warning about the decision of the law office, Paul Weiss, to negotiate an agreement with Trump, a Republican, in exchange for the president’s cancellation of an executive command targeting the company.

Paul Weiss approved the conditions that included the pledge equivalent to $ 40 million in free legal work to support the “agreed” mutual “management projects such as combating anti -Semitism and supporting the veterans.

Paul Weiss Prad Carb has defended the deal in the messages to colleagues, stressing that Trump’s executive thing has occurred to customers who look at the law firm as an “unwanted person” for management and “our company can easily destroy.” He said that the Trump administration will not dictate the legal work that the leading company will provide under the agreement.

The judge explodes the Trump administration “Innuendo”

An executive order against Perkins Koy included a laundry list of Trump’s grievances, especially with regard to the company’s work in the Democrat Hillary Clinton, its 2016 election rival.

Perkins Koy is a challenge in the court that targets him.

On Wednesday, an American judge refused to step down from this particular lawsuit after the administration accused her of bias.

The American boycott judge, Berell Huil, said that the Trump administration, which is seeking to obtain its rejection, was “widespread” and is not close to fulfilling the standard for lack of eligibility.

He cited the ministry’s prior statements against Trump supporters for January 6, 2021, on the attack on the American Capitol, and its dealings with conflicts related to his federal investigations after his first term in his post.

Huil said that the Trump administration’s criticism “reflects a serious misunderstanding of our constitutional order.”

Richard Primus, professor of constitutional law at the University of Michigan, who was previously working in Jenner & Block, said that the various orders of Trump are seeking to prove that lawyers will suffer if they opposed the interests of the president.

“They are a revenge program, partly,” said Primus.

“He does not get to know the legitimate opposition category,” he added. “If you oppose me, your actions are illegal, and you should avoid, punish and criminalize.”

Trump’s order, which was aimed at Jenner & Block, criticized his legal work that supports the protection of the rights of transgender persons and migrants. The matter accused the company of following up “partisan goals”.

Andrew Weissman, one of the company’s former partners, Andrew Weissman, worked as a major prosecutor for former private lawyer Robert Muller, who discussed communications between Trump’s campaign and Russian officials before the 2016 US elections.

Jenner & Block said on Tuesday that it “will follow all appropriate treatments” to challenge Trump’s order.

Kovington and Burling was narrower last month, citing the company’s representation of Jack Smith, a special advisor who presented federal criminal accusations against Trump, and the chapter that ended in the Republican victory in the elections was on November 5.

The state prosecutor also condemned Trump’s calls, his billionaire supporter Elon Musk and many Republican lawmakers to dismiss the federal judges who ruled against the administration and in some cases, prevented executive orders.

Trump criticized the American boycott judge James Boasberg in Washington, who prevented him from using wartime forces to deport Venezuelan immigrants.

The work squad was formed to ensure the security of the judges

Musk has elected the judges in more than 30 publications on social media since the end of January on its social media site X, describing them as “corrupt” or “evil”, and shaken what was called “the tyranny of the judiciary” after the judges prevented parts of his federal reduction management.

Such calls, and other criticisms, resulted in federal judges to warn the confirmation of their security in response to this Because of the high threats to them.

On Wednesday, the US Federal Judicial Authority launched a two -party work team that focuses on ensuring the continuation of security and the independence of the courts, according to a memorandum reviewed by Reuters.

While some of Trump’s allies have publicly criticized the judges, the conservative jurists who nominated them to the Supreme Court were also threatened.

Judge Brett Cavano was a goal to try an alleged assassination in 2022. Nicholas Rosk, the accused, was appointed to trial in this case in June.

Likewise, earlier this month, the police were called to Judge Amy Kony Barrett’s home after threatening a bomb targeting the address. Ultimately, no bomb was found after the threat of e -mail mentioned justice by name, as well as the ordeal of the Palestinians in Gaza.