UK University gets a well freedom of expression record on the policy of transgender

The British authorities issued a record against one of the country’s universities on Wednesday for issues that include failure to “adhere to the freedom of expression and academic freedom” in a political statement regarding the equal transgender equality, an escalation in the discussion of the rights of students and employees on the campus.

Student Office, Higher Education Organization in England, duty A penalty of 585,000 pounds, more than 755,000 dollars, at the University of Sussex. The fine followed an investigation at the university, which started more than three years ago after Kathleen Stoke, a professor of philosophy, said that she faced a campaign of harassment from students and activists on her views of sexual identity.

The fine from the organizer, the Student Office, comes amid risky talks on both Cross rights Freedom of expression on campus in the United States and Britain, where many universities are trying to balance the free expression right while preventing hate speech.

Doctor Stock Leave In 2021, after being accused of phobia by students and activists on the pretext that sexually transgender women were not women. she He said She faced a campaign of harassment, bullying and assassination of the character before taking off.

The university publicly defended Dr. Stoke at the time. But on Wednesday, the Student Office said Politics statement On non -transit and non -dual equality, it has created a “chilling effect” that can cause “self -censorship” for students and employees. The organizer said that this includes asking for training course materials to “represent transit persons and a positive life.” The school also punished a failure of government and administration operations.

The university condemned the ruling, saying in a statement It is impossible to create “policies to prevent abusive, bullying and harassment.” Sasha Rosenil, the university’s deputy consultant, promised to confirm a legal challenge and said that the organizer was imposing “the absolute thermal rule of free heat as the primary principle of UK universities” and was “perpetuating culture wars.”

President Trump made Sexual issues The campaign focus and in February effectively Prohibited Athletes who cross the competition in girls and women’s sports. The administration was also accused Targeting universities On transgender policies.

British government He said in January It would implement a new law to support academic freedom in universities, but he canceled a ruling that would allow anyone who claims that freedom of expression had been restricted to take legal action against the university.

“Students and academics do not have a chilling effect in this case.”

“Freedom of expression and academic freedom is not understood in our universities, and I was clear that when these principles are not supported, strong measures will be taken.”

The fine imposed on the University of Sussex is the most important demonstration after the regulator’s mandate. “It is completely appropriate for universities to follow the goals of equality.” “But,” he continued, “” They should be keen to do this without limiting legal speech and without creating the risk of indirect discrimination. “

Mr. Ahmed, who was appointed under the previous conservative government, described the investigation as “comprehensive” and said that he found “great and dangerous violations” of the regulations.

The university opposed. Dr. Rosenil called the “terrible and chosen” results.

She said that the investigation method was “completely unacceptable”, because the organizer did not speak to any university employees He only met with Dr. Stoke. Dr. Rosenil also described the fine “completely incompatible”.

The university put the ruling as part of the long tensions between the higher and organized education industry. In 2023, a report issued by a committee in the House of Lords, the appointed British Supreme Parliament, Find The organizer’s approach was “arbitrary, excessively and unnecessarily controlled.” In 2024, the government notes review I found that he was seen as “very aggressive and legal.”

Dr. Stoke did not respond to the comment.