India’s struggle to build a prosperous research system is deeper than just a low R&D spending. For decades, the country was a lack of scientific infrastructure and support, creating a vacuum where talents and innovation often dissolve before they could root. The result is a cycle of neglect: the system generates disappointment between ambitious researchers, who are forced to choose between emotion and the basic survival – especially in a society where learning is still outperforming the investigation.
The Post is taking into account the social media, which was ignited by the criticism of the Federation Minister of Joyl to Indian startups, revived the public discourse on this particular issue. Amid an increasing scrutiny of bureaucratic obstacles and government priorities in the scene of innovation in India, social media now highlight another point of inflammation – how bad the country supports research scientists.
This Virusian LinkedIn post brought this in acute focus, and revealed that a doctoral student at a first -class institute such as Iit Dehi, which works on advanced AI research, earns only $ 35,000 a month.
“A 33-year-old friend, married, follows a doctorate at IITD-earning only $ 35,000 per month. He is great, identical competitive exams (JEE, GAET, PhD interview), and spends his days in performing advanced research (AI), reviewing university studies, reviewing 100 research papers and publishing 10 papers, according to their education, which is due to support. Famous, with basic skills, earns his salary weakness and life more comfortably.
The post posed a difficult question: “Why is our system rewarded for money, and disturbing while surviving?”
He added: “PhD scholars are not just students – they are teachers, innovators and girls in the future. But they forget. Poverty should not ask for poverty. For all researchers who grind silently: your work is important. You are important. It is time to show it.”
Drawing after strong reactions across platforms. One of the users commented: “The industry never disturbs you on Jee, your gate points, your posts, etc., but it focuses on whether your skills are sufficient to meet its requirements … We also have a number of doctorates that receive the salary and at the same time prepare for competitive exams … Does this seem healthy … ????”
The latest feelings said: “This is true, the scholarship received by doctoral students is much less.
A third added that “the Indian government is really spending less on research and development and more than that towards free gifts. I know many friends of M.Tch who joined the doctorate. I wondered whether they were serious about their financial resources? Given inflation and cost, doctoral students get a doctorate and doctoral is not sustainable and often is disappointing.”
But not everyone agreed. One of the users argued, “First, this system is not limited to India only, as it is clear in all other countries as well. Secondly, the person’s salary depends in any field on the market value, and it is dictated with several other factors. With respect, I think this is a very raw comparison.”
Another pointed out: “PhD scientists conduct valuable research, and yes, it contributes to national development. But they are not employees – they are students and researchers in the future, and this is why they receive a salary and not a salary.”
There were also voices raising concerns about quality in research programs. “Given that a large part of the doctoral aspiring does not have essential skills to provide high -quality research, many doctoral evidence (including reputation institutes) is not efficient to contribute to value research, and more than 80 % of institutions are not enjoyed by many students as well, and there is an infrastructure suitable for complementing quality. Books.
https://akm-img-a-in.tosshub.com/businesstoday/images/story/202504/67f28774871fa-the-post-posed-a-hard-hitting-question-why-does-our-system-reward-mediocrity-with-money–and-brill-0653516-16×9.jpg
Source link